The nutritional value of expeller-pressed canola meal for grower-finisher pigs1

Seneviratne, R.W.; Young, Matthew J.; Beltranena, E.; Goonewardene, L. A.; Newkirk, Rex W.; Zijlstra, R. T.

doi:10.2527/jas.2009-2437

Cited by 86 publications

(72 citation statements)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Napus canola meals and cake The CP, EE and NDF content of NSECM and NEPCM were similar to those reported by others (Seneviratne et al, 2010;Woyengo et al, 2010). The less efficient oil extraction for the NCPCC, followed by NEPCM and then NSECM (Spragg and Mailer, 2007) caused the greatest EE and lowest CP and NDF content for NCPCC, followed by NEPCM and last by NSECM.…”

Section: Figuresupporting

confidence: 86%

In vitro digestion and fermentation characteristics of canola co-products simulate their digestion in the pig intestine

Woyengo

Jha

Beltranena

et al. 2016

Animal

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Canola co-products are sources of amino acid and energy in pig feeds, but their fermentation characteristics in the pig intestine are unknown. Thus, we determined the in vitro fermentation characteristics of the canola co-products Brassica juncea solvent-extracted canola meal (JSECM), Brassica napus solvent-extracted canola meal (NSECM), B. napus expeller-pressed canola meal (NEPCM) and B. napus cold-pressed canola cake (NCPCC) in comparison with soybean meal (SBM). Samples were hydrolysed in two steps using pepsin and pancreatin. Subsequently, residues were incubated in a buffer solution with fresh pig faeces as inocula for 72 h to measure gas production. Concentration of volatile fatty acids (VFA) per gram of dry matter (DM) of feedstuff was measured in fermented solutions. Apparent ileal digestibility (AID) and apparent hindgut fermentation (AHF) of gross energy (GE) for feedstuffs were obtained from pigs fed the same feedstuffs. On DM basis, SBM, JSECM, NSECM, NEPCM and NCPCC contained 15, 19, 22, 117 and 231 g/kg ether extract; and 85, 223, 306, 208 and 176 g/kg NDF, respectively. In vitro digestibility of DM (IVDDM) of SBM (82.3%) was greater ( P < 0.05) than that of JSECM (68.5%), NSECM (63.4%), NEPCM (67.5%) or NCPCC (69.8%). The JSECM had greater ( P < 0.05) IVDDM than NSECM. The IVDDM for NSECM was lower ( P < 0.05) than that for NEPCM, which was lower ( P < 0.05) than that for NCPCC. Similarly, AID of GE was greatest for SBM followed by NCPCC, JSECM, NEPCM and then NSECM. Total VFA production for SBM (0.73 mmol/g) was lower ( P < 0.05) than that of JSECM (1.38 mmol/g) or NSECM (1.05 mmol/g), but not different from that of NEPCM (0.80 mmol/g) and NCPCC (0.62 mmol/g). Total VFA production of JSECM was greater ( P < 0.05) than that of NSECM. Total VFA production of NSECM was greater ( P < 0.05) than that of NEPCM or NCPCC, which differed ( P < 0.05). The ranking of feedstuffs for total VFA production was similar to AHF of GE. In conclusion, in vitro fermentation characteristics of canola co-products and SBM simulated their fermentation in the small and large intestine of pigs, respectively. The 30% greater VFA production for JSECM than NSECM due to lower lignified fibre of JSECM indicates that fermentation characteristics differ between canola species. The NSECM had the highest fermentability followed by NEPCM and then NCPCC, indicating that fat in canola co-products can limit their fermentability in the hindgut.

show abstract

Section: Figuresupporting

confidence: 86%

In vitro digestion and fermentation characteristics of canola co-products simulate their digestion in the pig intestine

Woyengo

Jha

Beltranena

et al. 2016

Animal

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The CM showed the content of DM, crude protein, total amino acids and gross energy ( Table 1) to be smaller than those cited by Woyengo et al (2010) and Seneviratne et al (2010), who reported values of 895.2 g/kg and 956 g/kg DM, 417.7 g/kg and 385 g/kg CP; 21.8 and 24.2 g/kg lysine; 15 and 15.9 g/kg met+cys; 5,030 Kcal/kg and 4,812 kcal/ kg of GE, respectively.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 73%

Canola meal on starting pigs feeding

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Three experiments were carried out to determine the nutritional values and evaluate the performance of piglets fed on canola meal. In experiment I, a digestibility assay was conducted using fourteen barrow pigs, with an initial body weight of 20.62±3.30 kg. The evaluated feedstuff was canola meal, with a level of 250 g/kg in the basal diet (corn + soybean meal-based). The experimental unit consisted of one pig, with a total of seven experimental units per diet. The values as (fed basis) of digestible (DE) and metabolizable (ME) energy of canola meal were 2,995 kcal/kg and 2,796 kcal/kg, respectively. In experiment II, ileal digestibility assays were carried out to determine the apparent and true ileal digestibility coefficient and digestible amino acids. Three crossbred pigs were used, with a BW of 38.6±1.98 kg. The treatments consisted of two diets, with a single source of protein (canola meal) and one protein-free diet (OFD). The values of digestible amino acids in canola meal were as follows: lysine: 11.8 g/kg; methionine+cystine: 9.1 g/kg; threonine: 7.9 g/kg; tryptophan: 2.4 g/kg; leucine: 15.7 g/kg; and isoleucine: 8.7 g/kg. In experiment III, 60 piglets (BW= 15.08±0.72 kg to 30.26±2.78 kg) were allotted in a completely randomized design. The treatments consisted of four diets with increasing levels of canola meal (50, 100, 150 and 200 g/kg), six replicates and experimental unit consisted of two pigs. Additionally, a control diet was formulated containing 0.0 g/kg CM. Regression analysis indicates that there was no effect (P≥0.05) of the level of canola meal inclusion on pigs performance. The performance results suggest that it is feasible to use up to 200 g/kg of canola meal in starting pigs diet, without impairing performance and the feeding cost. Key words: Digestible amino acids, digestibility, ileal cannula, protein food, performance ResumoForam conduzidos três experimentos com o objetivo de determinar o valor nutricional e avaliar o desempenho de leitões alimentados com farelo de canola (FC). No Experimento I foi conduzido um ensaio de digestibilidade total com 14 suínos mestiços de linhagem comercial, machos castrados, com 20,32±3,30 kg de PV inicial. O alimento teste foi o farelo de canola, com o nível de 250 g/kg na ração referência (milho + farelo de soja). Cada suíno constituiu uma unidade experimental, totalizando sete unidades experimentais por ração. Os valores de energia digestível (ED) e energia metabolizável (EM) na matéria natural para o FC foram 2995 kcal/kg e 2796 kcal/kg respectivamente. No Experimento II foi conduzido um ensaio para determinar os coeficientes de digestibilidade ileal aparente e verdadeira e aminoácidos digestíveis. Foram utilizados três suínos canulados com 38,6±1,98 kg de PV. Os tratamentos consistiram em duas dietas, uma dieta contendo FC como única fonte de proteína e uma dieta isenta de

show abstract

“…previously been reported that inclusion of RSM at the levels of 7%, 14%, or 21% in growing-finishing pigs' diets had no negative effect on ADG, ADFI, and feed conversion ratio (McDonnell et al 2010). However, effect of RSM or CM in pig diets has been reported to be inconsistent in many reports (Corino et al 1991;Siljander-Rasi et al 1996;McDonnell et al 2010;Seneviratne et al 2010). Seneviratne et al (2010) reported that increasing dietary CM (0%, 7.5%, 15%, and 22.5%, respectively) linearly decreased ADG and ADFI but linearly increased G:F in growing-finishing pigs.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 90%

“…However, effect of RSM or CM in pig diets has been reported to be inconsistent in many reports (Corino et al 1991;Siljander-Rasi et al 1996;McDonnell et al 2010;Seneviratne et al 2010). Seneviratne et al (2010) reported that increasing dietary CM (0%, 7.5%, 15%, and 22.5%, respectively) linearly decreased ADG and ADFI but linearly increased G:F in growing-finishing pigs. In the present study, 4% CM or RSM fed in diet to pigs had no negative effects on ADG, ADFI, and G:F, suggesting that inclusion of 4% RSM or CM was not sufficient to impair growth performance of finishing pigs.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Rapeseed meal and canola meal can partially replace soybean meal as a protein source in finishing pigs

Yun

Lei

Lee

et al. 2017

Journal of Applied Animal Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This experiment was conducted to evaluate effects of replacing 'part' of soybean meal (SBM) with 4% rapeseed meal (RSM) or 4% canola meal (CM) on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood characteristics, faecal noxious gas emission, and meat quality in finishing pigs. A total of 120 crossbred finishing pigs [(Yorkshire × Landrace)× Duroc] with an average body weight of 50.71 ± 1.97 kg were randomly divided into one of three dietary treatments according to their sex and BW (10 replicate pens with 2 barrows and 2 gilts per pen). Dietary treatments were as follows: (1) CON, a corn-SBMbased diet; (2) CM4, diet containing 4% CM originated from Korea; (3) RSM4, diet containing 4% RSM originated from India. Replacing SBM with 4% RSM or 4% CM had no effects on average daily gain, average daily feed intake, gain to feed ratio, concentrations of blood urea nitrogen and creatinine, faecal ammonia, hydrogen sulphide, and total mercaptans emission, meat quality, and apparent total tract digestibility of dry matter, nitrogen, and gross energy. In conclusion, the inclusion of 4% of RSM or CM in finishing pig diets had no negative effects on growth performance, nutrients digestibility, faecal noxious gas emission, blood characteristics, and meat quality. ARTICLE HISTORY

show abstract

The nutritional value of expeller-pressed canola meal for grower-finisher pigs1

Cited by 86 publications

References 34 publications

In vitro digestion and fermentation characteristics of canola co-products simulate their digestion in the pig intestine

In vitro digestion and fermentation characteristics of canola co-products simulate their digestion in the pig intestine

Canola meal on starting pigs feeding

Rapeseed meal and canola meal can partially replace soybean meal as a protein source in finishing pigs

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About