2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.11.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The neural substrate of the ideomotor principle revisited: Evidence for asymmetries in action-effect learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
34
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
7
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, these processes of action-effect binding and effect-action retrieval resembled the processes of associative memory coding and retrieval, respectively. The involvement of associative memory in intention-based action was further improved by neuroimaging studies that revealed activations in both the supplementary motor area (SMA) and the medial temporal memory system, including hippocampus and parahippocampal gyrus, during either action image or execution (Elsner et al, 2002; Melcher et al, 2008, 2013; Pfister et al, 2014). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, these processes of action-effect binding and effect-action retrieval resembled the processes of associative memory coding and retrieval, respectively. The involvement of associative memory in intention-based action was further improved by neuroimaging studies that revealed activations in both the supplementary motor area (SMA) and the medial temporal memory system, including hippocampus and parahippocampal gyrus, during either action image or execution (Elsner et al, 2002; Melcher et al, 2008, 2013; Pfister et al, 2014). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reliable priming effects were indeed found in a variety of settings (for a review, see Shin et al, 2010). Moreover, such priming paradigms have been successfully used to study the neural basis of action-effect associations by contrasting the neural consequences of presenting former action effects as stimuli during simple RT tasks (Elsner et al, 2002;Melcher et al, 2008Melcher et al, , 2013Ku¨hn et al, 2010Ku¨hn et al, , 2011Ruge et al, 2010). These studies highlighted the hippocampus and the (pre-)supplementary motor area (SMA) as critical structures mediating response priming by former effect stimuli.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Experiment 1, the auditory information was a high or low pitched tone that was presented only when a specific button was contacted. Presentation of the effect tone alone was hypothesized to be sufficient for activating knowledge of the response, and likely the response codes that generate the tone, because there is behavioural (e.g., Elsner & Hommel, 2001) and neurophysiological (e.g., Kohler et al, 2002;Melcher, Weidema, Eenshuistra, Hommel, & Gruber, 2008, Melcher et al, 2013 evidence indicating that response representations can be activated following the perception of similar response-contingent auditory effect information when individual tones are consistently presented following a specific response. In Experiment 2, green and blue coloured paper was placed around the base of the target locations and the auditory information was the spoken words "green" or "blue" presented when the button surrounded by the green or blue paper was contacted, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%