2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.09.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The neural substrate of the ideomotor principle: An event-related fMRI analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
70
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
10
70
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As studies using PET and fMRI have shown, once an action eVect has been acquired its mere perception primes apparently associated motor structures (in the caudal supplementary motor area; Elsner et al, 2002;Melcher, Weidema, Eenshuistra, Hommel, & Gruber, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As studies using PET and fMRI have shown, once an action eVect has been acquired its mere perception primes apparently associated motor structures (in the caudal supplementary motor area; Elsner et al, 2002;Melcher, Weidema, Eenshuistra, Hommel, & Gruber, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, in the final blocks (B3 and B4), it was demonstrated an increasing of basic skills' domain and attention. In advanced stages of learning, the subjects better understanding the rules and the strategies of the task, and they can execute more automaticaly the fundamental habilities and reducing task complexity 24 . consequently, the shooter can maintain attention specifically in main shoot requirements, such as, integrate the better moment for trigger activation with the continue flow of visual and propioceptive feedback during the aim, even though minimizing intentionally the regulation of each component of the process separataly 8,13,15 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These and related observations from brain-imaging studies (Elsner et al, 2002;Melcher, Weidema, Eenshuistra, Hommel, and Gruber, 2008 and studies on action-effect learning in children (Eenshuistra, Weidema, & Hommel, 2004) have provided ample evidence suggesting that it makes sense to assume that perceiving an action-effect sequence results in the integration of action-related and effect-related codes. However, what is less clear is on what sort of codes the hypothesized integration process operate.…”
Section: How Do Motor Patterns Get Connected To Cognitive Codes Reprementioning
confidence: 90%
“…Further evidence has been provided by Elsner et al (2002) and Melcher et al (2008) who showed that the mere perception of auditory stimuli that previously had been presented as effect tones of certain actions results in the activation of neural structures that are selectively activated with voluntary but not stimulus-driven actions. Moreover, Kunde (2004) observed response priming by visual stimuli formerly presented as action effects although the prime stimuli were masked during the test phase and thus could not be consciously identified.…”
Section: What Are Codes Of Action-effects Used For?mentioning
confidence: 97%