2017
DOI: 10.1177/2399654417710659
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The neighbourhood roots of social cohesion: Notes on an exceptional case of Singapore

Abstract: At a time where neighbourhood ties seem to be declining, society’s expectations remain high that such local relations can be mobilized to manage a range of social issues. From a policy perspective, can the neighbourhood do more? Analyzing five waves of pooled cross-sectional data from Singapore between 2001 and 2009, we observe significant variations in neighbouring activity across residential contexts (e.g. public vs. private) as well as across time. By using the exceptional case of Singapore (small country, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Much of the revived interest in neighbouring can be attributed to its supposed ability to facilitate community participation (Cheshire, 2015;Corcoran et al, 2017;Crisp, 2013;Ho & Chua, 2017;Kearns & Parkinson, 2001). Yet despite the enthusiasm for neighbouring, few studies have actually examined the relationship between neighbouring and community participation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much of the revived interest in neighbouring can be attributed to its supposed ability to facilitate community participation (Cheshire, 2015;Corcoran et al, 2017;Crisp, 2013;Ho & Chua, 2017;Kearns & Parkinson, 2001). Yet despite the enthusiasm for neighbouring, few studies have actually examined the relationship between neighbouring and community participation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the value of neighborhoods for encounters, support, and social cohesion within cities has experienced a revival in recent years as a research subject. Severalstudies have scrutinized the aspects of integration, social cohesion, local social networks, and the impact of local living conditions on physical and mental health (Jensen, 2016;Kingsbury et al, 2019;Lancee & Dronkers, 2011;Strobl et al, 2016). The spatial proximity between neighbors, which makes it easy to meet one another has, in particular, regained attention as a unique characteristic of social networks in the neighborhood (Nocon & Pearson, 2000).…”
Section: Neighborhoods As Resources For Older Peoplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In studies on neighborhood relations, older people are often mentioned as, on the one hand, reliable inhabitants who have lived in the neighborhood for a long time and spend most of their time there (e.g., Cramm et al, 2013;Forrest & Kearns, 2001) and, on the other hand, recipients of neighborhood support (e.g., Fromm & Rosenkranz, 2019;Jensen, 2016). Studies on older people's relationships with their neighbors address, for example, the helping arrangements and motivations for neighborhood support (Nocon & Pearson, 2000), the role of social capital in establishing neighborhood relations (Lager et al, 2015), the possibility of preventing loneliness and isolation through neighborhood contacts (Cramm et al, 2013;Stanley et al, 2010;Wenger et al, 1996;Zimmerli, 2016), the reliability of non-kin carers (Gillespie & Treas, 2019;Nocon & Pearson, 2000) and the experience of changing neighborhood relations caused by the influx of younger inhabitants (Stjernborg, 2017;Ziegler, 2012).…”
Section: Neighborhoods As Resources For Older Peoplementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Neighborhoods have long garnered attention as local spaces for social cohesion in cities (Ho & Chua, 2018;Schiefer & van der Noll, 2017). Various studies stress the benefits of neighborhoods as sites of social connection across different cultural groups (Hudson, Phillips, & Ray, 2009;Jensen, 2016;Lancee & Dronkers, 2011), spaces of support in everyday life (Fromm & Rosenkranz, 2019), and places of social cohesion through place-based identity formation (Buffel, 2017;Forrest & Kearns, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%