The Need for Dominance Scale of the Manifest Needs Questionnaire and Role Behaviour in Groups

Mudrack, Peter E.; Farrell, Genevieve M.

doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.1994.tb00836.x

Cited by 6 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Evidence for dominance as a construct has been obtained across samples and instruments (Hamby, 1996;Hoskins, 1990;Mudrack & Farrell, 1994). Correlation coefficients with the subscales of Conflict Tactics Scale, Revised (CTS-2; Straus et al, 1996) supported the construct validity of the DS.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 87%

An Exploration of the Link Between Masculinity and Endorsement of IPV Myths in American Men

Gage¹,

Lease

2018

J Interpers Violence

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Current research has established a connection between men’s endorsement of traditional masculinity ideology and their perpetration of intimate partner violence (IPV) toward women. However, research has not yet identified the cognitive and affective pathways that link the endorsement of masculinity ideology and men’s beliefs about IPV. The current study examined men’s fear of intimacy, ambivalent (i.e., hostile and benevolent) sexism, and relationship dominance as potential mediating factors of the relationship between endorsement of traditional masculinity ideology and the acceptance of myths about male-to-female IPV in a community sample of 101 American men. Results supported the hypothesized relationship between men’s endorsement of traditional masculinity ideology and their support of myths minimizing the impact of male-to-female IPV or shifting the perceived responsibility for the offenses from the male perpetrators to the female victims. Multiple regression analyses indicated that while men’s hostile sexism and a preference for dominance in relationships did partially mediate the proposed relationship, fear of intimacy did not. The sample was largely homogeneous in terms of race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and educational background, although heterogeneous in age. Implications for prevention of IPV include the importance of addressing and challenging the pervasiveness of societal support of IPV myths. Clinical implications include the need for male-centric therapeutic interventions that respect male viewpoints, struggles, and strengths, and that work with, rather than against, a client’s sense of masculinity.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 87%

An Exploration of the Link Between Masculinity and Endorsement of IPV Myths in American Men

Gage¹,

Lease

2018

J Interpers Violence

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, when groups' focus is centered on the relations among the members the affi liation frame become prominent. Research has further indicated that need for dominance is associated with task roles but not for maintenance roles suggesting that dominance may be the primary frame for task roles (Mudrack & Farrell, 1994).…”

Section: Relational Framing Theorymentioning

confidence: 99%

Predicting social and personal attraction in task groups

Henningsen¹,

Henningsen²,

Booth³

2013

GPWK

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

<p><i>Equity and market forces are examined for their influence on the formation of social and personal attraction in groups. It is hypothesized that perceptions of task and maintenance behaviors during group interactions influence individuals’ perceptions of costs and rewards in groups which, in turn, drive assessments of social and personal attraction via either equity or market forces. Results indicate that equity forces are significantly linked with perceptions of social attraction and market forces significantly predict personal attraction. Theoretical implications are discussed regarding equity theory, social exchange theory, and relational framing theory.</i></p>

show abstract

“…Comparing a single measure of self-rated dominance with ratings by peers on Benne and Sheats's role list, Mudrack and Farrell (1994) reported that peers of dominant individuals reported that they tended to play task roles (e.g., initiator) and individual roles (e.g., aggressor) but not maintenance roles (e.g., harmonizer). In another study of 68 ongoing small groups of adult members, Mudrack and Farrell (1995) reported that the three role categories (task, group maintenance, and individual) were interrelated.…”

Section: Typing Roles By Interaction Processmentioning

confidence: 99%

Roles, Relationships, And Groups In Organizations: Some Conclusions And Recommendations

Hare

2003

Small Group Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Based on a review of the small groups literature on roles, relationships, and groups in organizations, some suggestions are made concerning the ways that research findings might be integrated into a more general theory of groups. Examples of the application of Parsons's analysis of four functions (meaning, resources, integration, and goal attainment) to small group phenomena are given to illustrate some of the possibilities for the extension of one of several current theoretical perspectives. Downloaded from quickly from a review of the literature to conclusions and recommendations. So I now omit the detailed reviews of the literature and give only my conclusions and recommendations drawing on my interest in the literature on small groups over the past 50 years. This

show abstract

The Need for Dominance Scale of the Manifest Needs Questionnaire and Role Behaviour in Groups

Cited by 6 publications

References 30 publications

An Exploration of the Link Between Masculinity and Endorsement of IPV Myths in American Men

An Exploration of the Link Between Masculinity and Endorsement of IPV Myths in American Men

Predicting social and personal attraction in task groups

Roles, Relationships, And Groups In Organizations: Some Conclusions And Recommendations

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About