Social Innovation 2012
DOI: 10.1057/9780230367098_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Nature of Social Innovation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
130
0
12

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 178 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
130
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Whether this has been commonly realized among researchers is unknown, but it does help explain wh y assertions like Nicholls and Murdock's (2012) that social innovation is not necessarily a net good, or McGowan & Westley's (2015) study of the intelligence test are the exception rather than the rule. This leads us to perhaps our most profound insight, to include in our cases programs that either blur the line between social innovation and social engineering, or that ultimately undermine social resilience.…”
Section: Methodological Advancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Whether this has been commonly realized among researchers is unknown, but it does help explain wh y assertions like Nicholls and Murdock's (2012) that social innovation is not necessarily a net good, or McGowan & Westley's (2015) study of the intelligence test are the exception rather than the rule. This leads us to perhaps our most profound insight, to include in our cases programs that either blur the line between social innovation and social engineering, or that ultimately undermine social resilience.…”
Section: Methodological Advancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…One challenge is to locate a starting point. Mulgan argues that social innovation is primarily a modern, urban, (post)industrial phenomenon, a response to the erosion of pre-modern social arrangements and informal social safety nets (Mulgan, 2006, 145;Nicholls & Murdock, 2012;Godin, 2012). Ayob et al (2016) are correct to place the term's initial, anemic emergence to the 19th century.…”
Section: Methodological Challengementioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Sosyal ilişkileri yapılandırma: Sosyal faydanın açığa çıkması için, karşılanması hedeflenen gereksinimler, insanlar arası ilişkilerle yaygınlaştırılmalıdır (Moulaert, 2007;Westley, 2008;Murray vd., 2010;Nicholls ve Murdock, 2012;Cajaiba-Santana, 2014). Sosyal inovasyon, bu bakımdan, sosyal ilişkileri de göz önüne alınarak işletilmesi gereken bir süreç olarak değerlendirilmektedir.…”
Section: Sosyal İnovasyonunclassified
“…To elaborate further, [18] highlighted, the above tangible elements is regard as the main indicators of innovation to gauge the magnitude of innovation during those economic timeframe [19]. Since the introduction of Schumpeter's technological innovation concept, there have been a growing number of innovation approaches emerged especially in the 1980s and 90s [19]. The most notable are from [20], [21], [22].…”
Section: Social Innovation and Knowledge Resourcementioning
confidence: 99%