1986
DOI: 10.1177/026565908600200303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Moor House School remedial programme: an evaluation

Abstract: Moor House School is a school for children of average nonverbal ability who have specific speech and language disorders. The educational careers of 120 children who left the school during the period 1979-1985 were investigated. The subjects were divided into four groups: Receptive Dysphasic (N = 12), Expressive Dysphasic (N = 21), Language Delay (N = 57), and Deviant Articulation (N = 30). Verbal ability at the time of entry to the school was compared with verbal ability when the remedial programme ended. The … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1987
1987
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The incidence of ocular anomalies in the Moor House School population is higher than in the school population as a whole (Ripley, 1982) and this would appear to be linked to the level of overall motor impairment in the Moor House School population. Ninety-one per cent of the children at the school scored above the 'normal range' on the Stott-Moyes-Henderson Test of Motor Impairment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The incidence of ocular anomalies in the Moor House School population is higher than in the school population as a whole (Ripley, 1982) and this would appear to be linked to the level of overall motor impairment in the Moor House School population. Ninety-one per cent of the children at the school scored above the 'normal range' on the Stott-Moyes-Henderson Test of Motor Impairment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, it did not provide information about the placements of children leaving units or for whom there were no language unit places available. Ripley (1986) produced another interesting article on educational placement beyond language provision, reporting that approximately 36% of children from a large residential language school were able to return to mainstream education before school-leaving age. As well as being focused on a single establishment, this study was concerned with a population of children with language impairment who required residential placements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An exception is the study by Pocklington and Hegarty (1982) who described in detail the development of a language unit in Oxfordshire and included in their discussion details of the curriculum followed. More commonly the curriculum has been discussed in the context of special schools for children with SLI (Hutt, 1986;Ripley, 1986).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%