1987
DOI: 10.1177/026565908700300306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reading problems and ocular anomalies

Abstract: Children at Moor House School for speech and language disorders were screened for minor ocular anomalies which might have affected their progress with reading. Ophthalmic investigation showed that 17 of the 23 children included in the initial screening had difficulties which merited intervention. The children with exophoria were introduced to a programme of eye exercises. The children with esophoria and those with miscellaneous ocular problems were given appropriate optical corrections. The treatment of minor … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1989
1989
1989
1989

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because they speak clearly it cannot be assumed that they will have no difficulty in reading and writing. Bicknell and Ripley (1987) studied 17 children at Moor House School for speech and language disorders that were identified as having difficulties in co-ordinating the activity of their eyes. As well as suffering from delayed language development and various degrees of deviant articulation they had also been identified for inclusion in the study on the basis of their slow progress in reading.…”
Section: Remedial Readingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because they speak clearly it cannot be assumed that they will have no difficulty in reading and writing. Bicknell and Ripley (1987) studied 17 children at Moor House School for speech and language disorders that were identified as having difficulties in co-ordinating the activity of their eyes. As well as suffering from delayed language development and various degrees of deviant articulation they had also been identified for inclusion in the study on the basis of their slow progress in reading.…”
Section: Remedial Readingmentioning
confidence: 99%