2011
DOI: 10.1021/cr200060g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Methylation Effect in Medicinal Chemistry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
402
0
11

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 701 publications
(420 citation statements)
references
References 273 publications
7
402
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, on closer inspection the effect of this group is not exactly what is classically termed the "magic methyl" effect (Leung et al, 2012), where the addition of a single methyl group in the "right" location on a scaffold results in a dramatic increase in activity, but rather a relatively modest 2.5-fold increase in potency on K Ca 3.1 combined with a moderate 3-5 loss in potency on K Ca 2.3 which overall results in a 40-100 fold increase in K Ca 3.1 selectivity compared with SKA-31. Given that these changes, although quite effective when combined, do not suggest major steric hindrance from stabilization of, for example, a large rotatable ring (Barreiro et al, 2011), we suspected that the gain in selectivity is primarily driven by hydrophobic interactions (e.g. the amount of hydrophobic protein surface buried upon ligand binding).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, on closer inspection the effect of this group is not exactly what is classically termed the "magic methyl" effect (Leung et al, 2012), where the addition of a single methyl group in the "right" location on a scaffold results in a dramatic increase in activity, but rather a relatively modest 2.5-fold increase in potency on K Ca 3.1 combined with a moderate 3-5 loss in potency on K Ca 2.3 which overall results in a 40-100 fold increase in K Ca 3.1 selectivity compared with SKA-31. Given that these changes, although quite effective when combined, do not suggest major steric hindrance from stabilization of, for example, a large rotatable ring (Barreiro et al, 2011), we suspected that the gain in selectivity is primarily driven by hydrophobic interactions (e.g. the amount of hydrophobic protein surface buried upon ligand binding).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, NAH compound 1 does not structurally match the compounds described in previous reports. Perhaps an ortho steric effect, exerted by the methyl group on the carbonyl, and/or an electronic effect induced by the pyrimidine ring could be related to the observed phenomenon [28]. Thus, we decided to study the stereoelectronic requirements for the existence of conformers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Observou-se que a inclusão de um grupo metila no carbono 5 do anel imidazol da histamina (22) levaria ao aumento da densidade eletrônica sobre o N-1 favorecendo, no equilíbrio, um dos tautômeros da 4-metil-histamina (23), o que ofereceu atributos para o desenho de um antagonista seletivo, a cimetidina (2). 23,24,26 (Esquema 5).…”
Section: Desenho Sob Medidaunclassified
“…4 Considerando a função N-acilidrazona (NAH) (24) (Figura 8), a denominação de estrutura privilegiada se deve ao extenso trabalho desenvolvido pelo LASSBio® através da exploração de abordagens da Química Medicinal no desenvolvimento de candidatos a fármacos, onde esse grupamento foi extensamente estudado e reunidos em algumas publicações quanto a suas diversas atividades biológicas. 26,30,31 Neste contexto, a subunidade NAH (24), como outras estruturas privilegiadas, podem consistir em uma vertente importante como ponto de partida para o desenho sob medida de fármacos. 13 …”
Section: 27unclassified