2008
DOI: 10.1007/s11225-008-9134-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Method of Socratic Proofs for Modal Propositional Logics: K5, S4.2, S4.3, S4F, S4R, S4M and G

Abstract: The aim of this paper is to present the method of Socratic proofs for seven modal propositional logics: K5, S4.2, S4.3, S4M, S4F, S4R and G. This work is an extension of [10] where the method was presented for the most common modal propositional logics: K, D, T, KB, K4, S4 and S5.Keywords: modal propositional logics, extensions of logic S4, the method of Socratic proofs, logic of questions, Inferential Erotetic Logic.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11 It is worth to mention that also other techniques of cooperative answering might be used with e-scenarios (after their execution, see [13]). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…11 It is worth to mention that also other techniques of cooperative answering might be used with e-scenarios (after their execution, see [13]). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A theorem-prover (an implementation of the method of Socratic proofs for Classical Propositional Logic described in [21]) written in Prolog by Albrecht Heefer is available at: http://logica.ugent.be/albrecht/ socratic.html. A theorem-prover (an implementation of the method of Socratic proofs for 15 basic propositional modal logics described in [10,11]) written in Prolog by Albrecht Heefer and Dorota Leszczynska-Jasion, is available at: http://logica. ugent.be/albrecht/socratic-modal.htm.…”
Section: Iel Tools and Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An erotetic calculus is a set of rules transforming such questions; at the same time, it constitutes a deduction system for the underlying logic. The method has been described for classical [12,37,39] and various non-classical logics [14,27,28,40].…”
Section: R-s Systems and The Logic Of Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the questions are constructed in such a way that they concern the consequence relation in L, then the method becomes in fact a proof-method for L. The method has been adjusted to CPL [26], to First-Order Logic [28], to the propositional parts of CLuN and CLuNs [30], to a large class of propositional modal logics [13][14][15], and to propositional intuitionistic logic [21]. Yet still, an erotetic calculus remains a calculus of questions.…”
Section: ]mentioning
confidence: 99%