2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-09348-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The measurement postulates of quantum mechanics are operationally redundant

Abstract: Understanding the core content of quantum mechanics requires us to disentangle the hidden logical relationships between the postulates of this theory. Here we show that the mathematical structure of quantum measurements, the formula for assigning outcome probabilities (Born’s rule) and the post-measurement state-update rule, can be deduced from the other quantum postulates, often referred to as “unitary quantum mechanics”, and the assumption that ensembles on finite-dimensional Hilbert spaces are characterized… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
55
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where ⊕ denotes sum modulo d. The corresponding CGLMP inequality is a facet of the associated local polytope [39] and reads:…”
Section: A Multiport Beam Splitters and Phase Shiftersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where ⊕ denotes sum modulo d. The corresponding CGLMP inequality is a facet of the associated local polytope [39] and reads:…”
Section: A Multiport Beam Splitters and Phase Shiftersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deriving the constraint that maximizes N such that N is larger than the dimension of the local bound can be an analytic approach to tighten a Bell's inequality. As the condition is the necessary condition for a Bell's inequality to be tight [25].…”
Section: B Local Realistic Upper Boundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zurek has suggested decoherence as an explanation of the Born rule [17], although this view has been criticized as well to be insufficient [18]. More recently, Masanes et al have claimed to derive the Born rule by assuming, among other things, that measurements consist of well-defined trials and always produce one of a pre-defined set of outcomes [19]. While seemingly innocuous, this assumption does not always hold in real, experimental settings where, for example, photons are detected at random times or, more often, not at all.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%