2018
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.98.042105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survey on the Bell nonlocality of a pair of entangled qudits

Abstract: The question of how Bell nonlocality behaves in bipartite systems of higher dimensions is addressed. By employing the probability of violation of local realism under random measurements as the figure of merit, we investigate the nonlocality of entangled qudits with dimensions ranging from d = 2 to d = 7. We proceed in two complementary directions. First, we study the specific Bell scenario defined by the Collins-Gisin-Linden-Massar-Popescu (CGLMP) inequality. Second, we consider the nonlocality of the same sta… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there exist bi-separable four-qubit states that violate this hypothetical bound. We found by a numerical study that the inequality satisfied by bi-separable four qubit states has the following dependence on the purity, M 4 8 81 ð1 À P 2 Þ: (11) This bound is also tight for P ! 5 8 and achieved by, e.g., the state p ϕ þ j i 12 hϕ þ j jϕ þ i 34 hϕ þ j þ ð1 À pÞjϕ þ i 13 hϕ þ j jϕ þ i 24 ϕ þ h j.…”
Section: Witnessing Entanglementmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, there exist bi-separable four-qubit states that violate this hypothetical bound. We found by a numerical study that the inequality satisfied by bi-separable four qubit states has the following dependence on the purity, M 4 8 81 ð1 À P 2 Þ: (11) This bound is also tight for P ! 5 8 and achieved by, e.g., the state p ϕ þ j i 12 hϕ þ j jϕ þ i 34 hϕ þ j þ ð1 À pÞjϕ þ i 13 hϕ þ j jϕ þ i 24 ϕ þ h j.…”
Section: Witnessing Entanglementmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Under the same constraints, also adaptive methods for entanglement detection have been developed 8,9 . In the absence of any reference frames Bell violations can be measured with some probability 10,11 and entanglement can be detected by evaluating the second moment of the distribution of correlations obtained by measuring random observables on each subsystem [12][13][14][15][16][17] . Furthermore, it has been shown recently that higher-order moments of this distribution allow discrimination of very specific types of multipartite entanglement 18 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The probability of violation of local realism under random measurements, proposed in [12,13], has gained considerable attention as an operational measure of nonclassicality of quantum states [14]. It has been demonstrated both numerically [15][16][17][18] and analytically [14,19] that this quantity is a good candidate for a nonlocality measure. Furthermore, in [19] it was proved that this quantifier satisfies some natural properties and expectations for an operational measure of nonclassicality, e.g., invariance under local unitaries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The probability of violation of local realism under random measurements, proposed in [1], has gained considerable attention as an operational measure of nonclassicality of quantum states [2]. It has been demonstrated both numerically [3][4][5] and analytically [2,6] that this quantity is a good candidate for a nonlocality measure. What is more, in [6] it was proved that this quantifier satisfies some natural properties and expectations for an operational measure of nonclassicality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%