2014
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2515037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Market for Electric Vehicles: Indirect Network Effects and Policy Impacts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
46
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Li et al . [2017] offer the first study in quantifying the role of indirect network effects in the EV market and its implications on government subsidy policies (subsidizing the charging station investment versus subsidizing EV purchase). Similar to Li et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Li et al . [2017] offer the first study in quantifying the role of indirect network effects in the EV market and its implications on government subsidy policies (subsidizing the charging station investment versus subsidizing EV purchase). Similar to Li et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to Li et al . [2017], Springel [2017] quantifies indirect network effects in Norway's EV market and also finds that subsidizing charging stations is more cost‐effective than subsidizing EV purchase in the early stage of the EV diffusion process. Li [2016] focuses on the competing plug standards for charging stations and examines the impact of compatibility on investment in charging stations and consumer adoption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, other studies using this model which have focused on infrastructure [29,30] suggest, and correlate with other literature [31][32][33], that dense charge point provision has low importance to early EV adopters. It is noted that some studies are known to have placed stronger correlation between uptake and infrastructure [34][35][36], or at least acknowledge that concerns over recharging may deter EV purchase, but this is as much related to range and recharge time as infrastructure provision. However, little evidence was found to directly regard early adopters, so we retain our supposition that it is logical that they would be more reliant on private charging provision.…”
Section: Case Study 1: the Netherlandsmentioning
confidence: 99%