2001
DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2001.tb02099.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Localism Principle in Communications Policymaking and Policy Analysis: Ambiguity, Inconsistency, and Empirical Neglect

Abstract: Localism long has been a central guiding principle in communications policymaking, yet its specific meaning and objectives have not been well articulated by policymakers. This article attempts to bring greater clarity to the localism principle, through an examination of how the Federal Communications Commission has defined local programming. Policymakers have failed to establish a clear and stable definition of what constitutes local programming, which has contributed to the sense of ambiguity, uncertainty, an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the USA, the importance of localism for democracy was recognized for the media via the legal principle of broadcast localism, which required that broadcast media serve their local communities and meet guidelines regarding location, accessibility, and programming. Changes in federal regulations, the shift away from broadcast media, and media consolidation have weakened both the principle and practice of media localism (Hilliard and Keith 2005; Napoli 2001). However, there is also a growing community media movement, and there have been limited but favorable developments in areas such as community radio and Internet‐based, local, independent news and information (Brand 2004; Dunaway 2002; Nieckarz 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the USA, the importance of localism for democracy was recognized for the media via the legal principle of broadcast localism, which required that broadcast media serve their local communities and meet guidelines regarding location, accessibility, and programming. Changes in federal regulations, the shift away from broadcast media, and media consolidation have weakened both the principle and practice of media localism (Hilliard and Keith 2005; Napoli 2001). However, there is also a growing community media movement, and there have been limited but favorable developments in areas such as community radio and Internet‐based, local, independent news and information (Brand 2004; Dunaway 2002; Nieckarz 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Respondents in our study agreed that localism was about retaining customer choice of producers, preserving “unique cultural values and traditions within particular communities,” and aiming for a “reduction in the scale of decision-making and a genuine transfer of power to the decentralized units” (Napoli, 2001, pp. 380-381; see Frug, 1980).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In US broadcast policy, the regional/local question is captured via the notion of ''localism'', the term used by the government and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) when compelling, inter alia, local TV stations to ensure localised accountability structures and to carry locally oriented/originated programming not provided to them by their parent New York-based national networks (Klinenberg, 2007;Napoli, 2001). US TV decentralisation is also achieved via the local ''public access'' channels, which cable TV companies are compelled to support and carry.…”
Section: Stewardship (Balancing Public and Private Interests)mentioning
confidence: 99%