Centrist television in the democratic South Africa: policymakers fail to answer the regional/local question, 1990-2011

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore the disconnect between policy intent and policy implementation in relation to regional/local (sub-national) TV deliverables in South Africa between 1990 and 2011, and evaluate the impact of this disconnect in pursuit of public interest objectives. Design/methodology/approach – The article is based on a research case study in which data extracted from policy documents and interviews were qualitatively analysed via the Kingdon “policy streams” framework and the Feintuck and Varney public interest media regulation framework. Findings – It was found that ruptures in deliberative policymaking, and policy implementation missteps, undermined sub-national TV delivery and, in turn, undermined pursuit of the public interest. Originality/value – By combining a political science conceptual framework with a media policy conceptual framework, the article provides unique insights into South African TV policymaking in the early democratic era.

Broadcasting change: An aerial overview of South African television debates in an age of constant transition

“…These advancements into Africa are contrasted by failings to provide adequate subnational/community television. In his study of policy developments between 1990 and 2011, Chris Armstrong (2013) paints a bleak picture of South African television's ability to effectively provide localised content. The Independent Broadcast Act (1993) and the Electronic Communications Act (2005) emphasise the need to develop television's public service on national, regional and local levels.…”

“…Armstrong’s research points towards several policy failings. He concludes that by 2011, ‘the community TV sector was in a dysfunctional state; and in the public and private TV sectors, the commercially orientated national channels SABC TV and e.TV were characterised by insufficient engagement with the realities of viewers living beyond the country’s primary urban centres.’ This, he argues, is due to ‘ruptures in deliverable policymaking and significant policy implementation missteps’ (Armstrong 2013: 128).…”