2012
DOI: 10.1002/smi.1436
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Korean Version of the Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale: An Extended Validation

Abstract: The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) is a brief self-rating questionnaire for measuring resilience. The aims of the present study were to describe the development of a Korean version of the CD-RISC (K-CD-RISC) and to more firmly establish its psychometric properties in terms of reliability and validity. The participants consisted of a general population sample (n=194) and psychiatric outpatients (n=127) with non-psychotic mood or anxiety disorders. The K-CD-RISC score means (standard deviation) were … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
54
0
6

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
5
54
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Original psychometric analyses of the CD-RISC in a primarily Caucasian sample in the United States found a five-factor solution, which has been replicated in a study of adolescents in China [29] and in a general population sample in Korea [30]. These five factors were described as follows: (1) personal competence, high standards, and tenacity; (2) trust in one’s instincts, tolerance of negative affect, and strengthening effects of change; (3) positive acceptance of change and secure relationships; (4) control; and (5) spiritual influences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Original psychometric analyses of the CD-RISC in a primarily Caucasian sample in the United States found a five-factor solution, which has been replicated in a study of adolescents in China [29] and in a general population sample in Korea [30]. These five factors were described as follows: (1) personal competence, high standards, and tenacity; (2) trust in one’s instincts, tolerance of negative affect, and strengthening effects of change; (3) positive acceptance of change and secure relationships; (4) control; and (5) spiritual influences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Resilience was measured using the CD‐RISC. The CD‐RISC distinguishes between those with greater or lesser resiliency and has been validated in multiple settings . It is composed of 25 questions with no subscales.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total score ranges from 0-100, with higher scores reflecting greater resilience. The CD-RISC scale has demonstrated internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficients ranging between 0.86 and 0.92 (Baek et al, 2010;Fu, Leoutsakos & Underwood, 2014;Jung et al 2012;Karairmak, 2010;Yu et al, 2011).…”
Section: Resiliencementioning
confidence: 98%
“…For instance, Yu and Zhang (2007) reported three factors (tenacity, strength and optimism), while Singh and Yu (2010) reported a four factor structure (hardiness, optimism, resourcefulness and purpose). Studies by Jung et al (2012) and Yu et al (2011) yielded a five factor structure. Bums and Anstey (2010) considered the CD-RSC a uni-di mensional resilience instrument (Bums & Anstey, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%