2008
DOI: 10.2137/145960610791015041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The irrelevance of stated plans in predicting farm successions in Finland

Abstract: This study estimates the value of farmers' stated succession plans in predicting revealed succession decisions. The stated succession plan exists when a farmer answers in a survey questionnaire that the farm is going to be transferred to a new entrant within a five year period. The succession is revealed when the farm is transferred to a successor. The stated and revealed behaviour is estimated as a recursive Binomial-ProbitModel, which accounts for censoring of the decision variables and controls for a potent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10. Exceptions analyzing ex-post (actual) succession decisions using panel data are studies by Kimhi (1994), Kimhi and Bollman (1999), Stiglbauer and Weiss (2000) and Väre et al (2010). 11.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…10. Exceptions analyzing ex-post (actual) succession decisions using panel data are studies by Kimhi (1994), Kimhi and Bollman (1999), Stiglbauer and Weiss (2000) and Väre et al (2010). 11.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 In general, there are substantial differences between stated and revealed behavior of children, which may cause a 'generation bias' in the analysis (Väre et al, 2010).…”
Section: Empirical Framework Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The event of family business transfer in the sample was treated as a dichotomous variable, inferred from farm-holder expectation on whether farm succession would take place in the future. It is worth remembering that such expectations may not result in actual behaviour (Väre et al 2010). As the aim of the analysis was to explore the improvement in farm succession estimations brought by labour market and surrounding conditions (LMSC) variables, in comparison to farm and farmer features, both the former and the latter have been selected as explanatory variables.…”
Section: Data and Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This type of event may be observed directly (following a sample or a population of farms over a long time span, Stiglbauer and Weiss 2000) or may be inferred by asking a farmer his/her expectations about farm transfer (Glauben et al, 2004). In the former case, the information is more reliable, while data based on farmer statements may be inconsistent with respect to the actual event of succession (Väre et al 2010). Most of the analyses have been carried out at the farm level, while few have focused on the probability that each potential heir in a family farm will take over the farm (Simeone 2006;Mann 2007;Aldanondo Ochoa et al 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second group of variables included in almost all studies comprises various indicators of farm income (Hennessy, 2002;Mishra et al, 2010), also including Standard Gross Margin (Glauben et al, 2004;Corsi, 2009), farm area (Kimhi and Nachlieli, 2001;Hennessy, 2002;Väre et al, 2010), livestock units (Stiglbauer and Weiss, 2000), and profits (Glauben et al, 2009). The majority of the studies find a significant and positive effect on succession (only for Mishra et al 2010, and for Väre et al, 2010 the relevant estimate is not significant).…”
Section: The Determinants Of Successionmentioning
confidence: 99%