2015
DOI: 10.4000/travailemploi.6804
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Interrelationship of Collective Bargaining at Industry and Company-Levels in Wage Determination

Abstract: This article originates from a research report (CASTEL, DELAHAIE, PETIT, 2011a) conducted under the responsibility of Héloïse PETIT as part of a research project sponsored by the CFDT trade union with the financial support of the IRES (Institut de recherches économiques et sociales-Institute of Economic and Social Research). We thank the participants of the CEE (Centre d'études de l'emploi-Centre for Employment Studies) seminar, especially Jean SAGLIO and Thomas AMOSSÉ, and two anonymous referees for their com… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In METAL1 and METAL2, which belong to a listed group and a company controlled by a private equity fund, respectively, wage restrictions result from a unilateral decision by management even if the parent group imposes its directives in this matter. This fact is consistent with the finding that wage bargaining margins are limited in the context of centralized decision‐making at the company or group headquarters level (Castel et al, 2015). Although local employee representatives experienced limited leeway to weigh in on the wage‐related adjustments decided by the parent group, their structural power helps to locally create a climate favourable to exchanges between management and employees beyond differences in trade‐union organization.…”
Section: Collective Bargaining Under Pressure: From Negotiating Mutual Cb To Opportunistic Adjustmentssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In METAL1 and METAL2, which belong to a listed group and a company controlled by a private equity fund, respectively, wage restrictions result from a unilateral decision by management even if the parent group imposes its directives in this matter. This fact is consistent with the finding that wage bargaining margins are limited in the context of centralized decision‐making at the company or group headquarters level (Castel et al, 2015). Although local employee representatives experienced limited leeway to weigh in on the wage‐related adjustments decided by the parent group, their structural power helps to locally create a climate favourable to exchanges between management and employees beyond differences in trade‐union organization.…”
Section: Collective Bargaining Under Pressure: From Negotiating Mutual Cb To Opportunistic Adjustmentssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Decentralised bargaining has not developed to the detriment of sector bargaining (Jobert, 2000; Tallard and Vincent, 2014). The latter continued to develop, but now plays a lesser role in the wage dynamics, which are essentially driven by the legal minimum wage and company bargaining (Castel et al , 2015).…”
Section: The Long-term Development Of Collective Bargainingmentioning
confidence: 99%