The interface between rural communities in South Africa and their urban counterparts: the significance for sustainable rural community development in the Vaalharts area

Abstract

Even though Africa is one of the least urbanized regions in the world it is also the region in which cities grow the fastest, resulting in urban areas experiencing a wide spectrum of problems while rural areas are left drained. It is widely acknowledged that the vast majority of rural inhabitants in developing countries live below the poverty line, but what is not so widely known is the extent to which the livelihoods and well-being of these rural areas are linked to their urban counterparts.It has become increasingly difficult to separate communities into rural or urban entities/areas due to many households relying on both urban and rural based resources, this is especially true in South Africa where the Apartheid legacy has had a lingering effect on urban-rural linkages. In South Africa the interdependence between rural communities and distant cities are higher than elsewhere with many rural residents living in urban domains while maintaining family, social and financial ties in rural areas.Rural areas in South Africa have been experiencing economic and social decay over the past decades due to urban migration and this in turn has reduced the provision of services, facilities and employment opportunities in rural areas. It is due to these factors that the concept of sustainable rural community development is of particular relevance to South Africa. Sustainable rural community development is necessary in order to achieve more integrated and sustainable rural areas with a better environment and a higher quality of life and an understanding of the complex linkages between urban and rural areas in required for the The Sustainable City IX, Vol. 1 453 successful planning of rural sustainable development. This paper examines how these multifaceted linkages impacts on sustainable community development in the unique case of the Vaalharts area.

Multidimensional Quality of Life of Older Adults in South Africa

“…This is consistent with the previous research (Nzabona et al, 2016;Tobiasz-Adamczyk & Zawisza, 2017), where individuals living in urban areas had enhanced well-being outcomes compared to those in rural areas. Rural areas in SA are characterised as economically and socially deprived due to urban migration, which causes a lack of services, facilities and employment opportunities (van Schalkwyk et al, 2014).…”

Transforming the Marginalised via IJRCS: The need to Rejig Rural and Community Studies towards Emancipation

“…There is no generally accepted definition of rurality; rather, each country has specific characteristics peculiar to its own situation. Some countries see rurality as a community that lacks social amenities, communities with abundant farmlands, a marginalised located people, people with little and no access to good roads, education, water and electricity supply (van Schalkwyk, Schoeman & Cilliers, 2014;du Toit, 2017) among others.…”

Considering New Urbanism, New Ruralism and Green Urbanism in Response to Multifunctionality: The Case of Verkykerskop, South Africa

“…The uniqueness of the Southern African landscape, inherently being rural, necessitates a rural accentuation on multifunctionality [22]. Nonetheless, it is alarming that despite the proven economic value of the multifunctional use of the natural environment, its large-scale destruction and degradation in the South African rural landscape, is imminent [21].…”