2014
DOI: 10.1002/smj.2295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The interactions of institutions on foreign market entry mode

Abstract: This paper examines the interaction effects of institutional differences in the cognitive, normative, and regulatory domains on cross-border acquisition and alliance formation. Using a sample of 673 cross-border acquisitions and alliances conducted by multinational corporations (MNCs) from the manufacturing sector of six emerging economies (EEs) over the period 1995-2008, we find significant mimicking (cognitive domain) of local firms' choice of ownership modes by EE firms.We also find that regulatory distance… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
153
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 173 publications
(171 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
4
153
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Because all these studies have used numbers of prior choices as a predictor of current ones, they have, however, been unable to unambiguously establish why firms often make the same choices as they themselves and their peers made before. Some studies have argued that firms learn from prior choices (e.g., Padmanabhan & Cho, 1999;Vermeulen & Barkema, 2001) whereas others have added that they may also imitate such choices, either ritualistically or to establish intra-firm or local external legitimacy (e.g., Ang, Benischke, & Doh, 2014;Guillen, 2003;Yiu & Makino, 2002). There may also be a third -hitherto overlooked -explanation, that is, the continued presence of key factors that led the focal firm or its peers to use the same mode for previous entries.…”
Section: Research Avenuesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Because all these studies have used numbers of prior choices as a predictor of current ones, they have, however, been unable to unambiguously establish why firms often make the same choices as they themselves and their peers made before. Some studies have argued that firms learn from prior choices (e.g., Padmanabhan & Cho, 1999;Vermeulen & Barkema, 2001) whereas others have added that they may also imitate such choices, either ritualistically or to establish intra-firm or local external legitimacy (e.g., Ang, Benischke, & Doh, 2014;Guillen, 2003;Yiu & Makino, 2002). There may also be a third -hitherto overlooked -explanation, that is, the continued presence of key factors that led the focal firm or its peers to use the same mode for previous entries.…”
Section: Research Avenuesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…According to the World Investment Report (WIR, ), most emerging economy governments (e.g., China and Brazil) now actively encourage local enterprises to go global. While most studies have focused on MNCs from developed economies, a growing body of studies (e.g., Ang, Benischke, & Doh, ; Contractor, Kumar, & Kundu, ; Kalasin, Dussauge, & Rivera‐Santos, ; Peng, ; Sun, Peng, Ren, & Yan, ; Yaprak & Karademir, ) have examined the expansion behavior and international entry strategies of emerging market firms into other foreign markets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to a manager of HPP, "Two things move us: the first is the certainty that this is the best choice; the second is because this is the best and we are going to do this with people and sometimes in spite of people" (Interview HPP-01, emphasis added). This revealed a conflict between concern with organizational performance and relevant institutions, which highlights the influence of the environment on organizational choices, and decisions based on the assumption of a strategy-mediated impact of institutional pressure (Ang et al, 2015;Paroutis & Heracleous, 2013).…”
Section: Tension Between Internal Conditions and Environmental Pressuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these are not the only explanatory elements of the strategy formation process, it is recognized that their implications challenge the transformation of intentions into actions. After all, being institutionally embedded (Greenwood et al, 2014;Peng, Sun, Pinkhan, & Chen, 2009), the strategic decisions of agents are influenced not only by results from a purely economic viewpoint but also by aspects perceived as socially appropriate (Ang, Benischke, & Doh, 2015;Lieberman & Asaba, 2006).…”
Section: Organization Strategies and The Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%