2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The integration of a stakeholder perspective into the front end of eco-innovation: a practical approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
56
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(36 reference statements)
1
56
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The outputs of workshops held to validate this approach have been visionary and speculative in nature. The findings from this research places the tool in contrast to most existing eco-design tools [21], and instead aligns it with the FEEI approach described by Tyl et al [24]. Relatively few examples exist of the application of speculative design [50] to the imagining of sustainable futures [30,51,52], though in common with this previous work the nature of the PSS scenarios generated through the CIM tool means they do not provide definitive 'answers' to circular design problems; rather they illustrate possible futures that cause questioning of assumptions and act as the starting point for future investigations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The outputs of workshops held to validate this approach have been visionary and speculative in nature. The findings from this research places the tool in contrast to most existing eco-design tools [21], and instead aligns it with the FEEI approach described by Tyl et al [24]. Relatively few examples exist of the application of speculative design [50] to the imagining of sustainable futures [30,51,52], though in common with this previous work the nature of the PSS scenarios generated through the CIM tool means they do not provide definitive 'answers' to circular design problems; rather they illustrate possible futures that cause questioning of assumptions and act as the starting point for future investigations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The development of the CIM tool builds on both Geissdoerfer et al's [23] value mapping tool and Tyl et al's [24] aspirational vision for FEEI in which design is understood as "something that is not just related to the product itself, but relates to the whole product life, its systems, stakeholders and the activities and effects that emerge from this". Underlying its construction is the concept of the PSS, in which tangible goods and associated services are integrated such that "value creation is less about sales and ownership of individual products and more of a focus on the ongoing delivery of the service-value embedded in that product" [26].…”
Section: Justification Of the Use Of User Experience Research Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is a product life-cycle management approach to mitigate uncoordinated product planning, for example, eliminating a toxic substance should not lead to higher energy consumption, which on balance could have a negative impact on the environment (European Commission, 2012). The core premise of an ecodesign approach is the need to foster life cycle thinking through design, to consider the entire product life cycle (Bonou et al, 2016) in collaboration with stakeholders (O'Connor & Hawkes, 2001;Tyl et al, 2015). Implementation of such principles are essential if industry is to become more sustainable in the long-term.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%