2018
DOI: 10.1002/bse.2063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eco‐innovation strategies: A panel data analysis of Spanish manufacturing firms

Abstract: This paper examines the determinants of eco‐innovation strategy in Spanish manufacturing firms. Using panel data of 3,201 Spanish firms for the period 2008–14, we specify a dynamic random probit model controlling for sample selection. The empirical results confirm that public regulations and R&D efforts encourage firms to place eco‐innovation activities among their strategic priorities, although subsidies are not found to be a distinctive driver. Furthermore, we find that eco‐innovation is highly persistent at… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
95
1
5

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
(196 reference statements)
3
95
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In the context of Europe, Spain is below the European average in the development of eco‐innovation products, occupying the ninth position (Triguero et al, ). In addition, the presence of SMEs is comparatively more important in the productive structure of Spain, and these companies have a lower perception of the benefits of environmental management than the larger companies (Del Río et al, ; Jové‐Llopis & Segarra‐Blasco, ). These factors could introduce biases in our analysis, for which the study should be expanded to other countries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the context of Europe, Spain is below the European average in the development of eco‐innovation products, occupying the ninth position (Triguero et al, ). In addition, the presence of SMEs is comparatively more important in the productive structure of Spain, and these companies have a lower perception of the benefits of environmental management than the larger companies (Del Río et al, ; Jové‐Llopis & Segarra‐Blasco, ). These factors could introduce biases in our analysis, for which the study should be expanded to other countries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Doran and Ryan () affirm that eco‐innovation is the development of a product, process, service, or organizational innovation and that the final objectives are the narrowing of pollution and the sustainability of the economy. In general terms, eco‐innovation refers to innovation in new products, services, or new business practices, necessary to create new business opportunities and benefits to the environment (Arranz, Arroyabe, Molina‐García, & de Arroyabe, ; Dangelico, ; Jové‐Llopis & Segarra‐Blasco, ;. In fact, Horbach et al () and Peiró‐Signes and Segarra‐Oña () conclude that eco‐innovation can be defined as a typology of innovation, which provides environmental benefits.…”
Section: Theoretical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Closely related to the CE—although rarely explicitly connected—the EI literature also uses “win‐win” arguments to suggest that the trade‐off between economic growth and environmental conservation at the firm level can be resolved through EI such as cleaner production and eco‐design of products (Beckmann, Hielscher, & Pies, ; Doran & Ryan, ; Jové‐Llopis & Segarra‐Blasco, , among others). European Commission defines EI as “… all forms of innovation—technological and non‐technological—that creates business opportunities and benefits the environment by preventing or reducing their impact, or by optimising the use of resources” (European Commission, , p. 1).…”
Section: Ce and Sme Growth—conceptual Framework And Empirical Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, given that green technologies are continuously advancing (Chu, Chun, & Ahn, ), firms have more opportunities to implement EMPs by exploring and acquiring advanced green technologies (Wicki, 2019) and to achieve innovation with significant green benefits. In addition, the ability to implement EMPs is usually time dependent (Jové‐Llopis & Segarra‐Blasco, ). Over time, firms may become more experienced with and may be able to achieve greater improvements in performance by implementing EMPs.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%