“…Daily horoscopes are a feature of countless newspapers in North America and Europe, but that does not render them trustworthy in the eyes of most people _ ; so we must be cautious about assuming that Muslims treat such publications are more than entertainment. There are however, enough ethnographic accounts of the seriousness with which many Muslims regard what are classified as true dreams (again, see Balzani; Louw this issue, as well as Edgar 2006;2007), that it is safe to conclude that dreams are not merely entertainment for many (and possibly most) 1 Though clearly not all--if one treats certain bodily functions as decisions, then one could argue that little higher cognitive functioning is necessary to arrive at appropriate decisions._ 2 As with a great many terms used in this paper, I shall dispense with a systematic discussion of the ambiguities and contradictions introduced with the concept of indigenousness. Suffice to say that I do not restrict such a term to subsistence rainforest dwellers or small scale isolated communities, but rather imply something broader that encompasses any relatively coherent, identifiable local population that self identifies as having some communitarian cultural systems in common._ 3 Charpai perhaps needs no translation for a British audience, but for the sake of clarity, a charpai is the four legged cot, sofa or bed that serves so many functions across South Asia._ 4 Even those who subscribe to astrology and accord it a certain degree of external, universal validity, are often disdainful of the daily horoscope found in newspapers._…”