2010
DOI: 10.1080/02757206.2010.500617
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imprints of Dreaming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study of dreaming has an illustrious if scattered history in anthropology (see Bulkeley 2001;Heijnen and Edgar 2010;Laughlin 2011;Mageo 2003;Stewart 2004;Tedlock 1987 and 1991 for reviews of the literature). Since the 1980s, anthropological studies of dreaming have tended to focus on emic dream theories and their links to indigenous ontologies (see, for example, Guss 1980;Kracke 2006;Peluso 2004;Poirier 2005;Smith 1998;Watson 1981); dream sharing as a situated (and often shifting) cultural practice (see, for example, Edgar and Henig 2010;Louw 2010;Mittermaier 2010;Pandya 2004;Price-Williams and Degerrod 1989;Qureshi 2010) and the ways in which notions of self, culture, and history are under construction and at play in dreaming (see for example Ceccioni 2011;Edgar 2011;Ewing 1990;Hollan 2004Hollan , 2013Kirtsoglou 2010;Lohmann 2003Lohmann , 2010Mageo 2003Mageo , 2011Mageo , 2013Mageo , 2015Stephen 1996;Stewart 2012).…”
Section: Interdisciplinary Bridgesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of dreaming has an illustrious if scattered history in anthropology (see Bulkeley 2001;Heijnen and Edgar 2010;Laughlin 2011;Mageo 2003;Stewart 2004;Tedlock 1987 and 1991 for reviews of the literature). Since the 1980s, anthropological studies of dreaming have tended to focus on emic dream theories and their links to indigenous ontologies (see, for example, Guss 1980;Kracke 2006;Peluso 2004;Poirier 2005;Smith 1998;Watson 1981); dream sharing as a situated (and often shifting) cultural practice (see, for example, Edgar and Henig 2010;Louw 2010;Mittermaier 2010;Pandya 2004;Price-Williams and Degerrod 1989;Qureshi 2010) and the ways in which notions of self, culture, and history are under construction and at play in dreaming (see for example Ceccioni 2011;Edgar 2011;Ewing 1990;Hollan 2004Hollan , 2013Kirtsoglou 2010;Lohmann 2003Lohmann , 2010Mageo 2003Mageo , 2011Mageo , 2013Mageo , 2015Stephen 1996;Stewart 2012).…”
Section: Interdisciplinary Bridgesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The largest number of memorable dreams were nightmares, night terrors, and sleep paralysis, followed by wondrous, healing and consoling, premonitory, repetitive, and lucid dreams. The dreamers' explanations about why dreams were memorable support current notions in anthropology that posit a lack of a radical separation between dreaming and waking reality (Heijnen and Edgar 2010) and that situations in dreams lead people to ponder possible scenarios in their daily lives (Lohmann 2010). The study also finds that the participants were receptive to local theories of dreams, that there were multiple and coexisting theories of dreams, and that they play a role in decision-making and in the dreamers' interpretation of their lives (Degarrod 2020).…”
Section: Experiencing Emotional Traces Of Dreamsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…For recent reviews of dreams as indices of sociohistorical change, see Heijnen and Edgar (), Mageo (), and Stewart ().…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%