2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11187-016-9824-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of the CEO’s business education on the performance of hybrid organizations: the case of the global microfinance industry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, post-hoc analysis revealed that the MBA program ranking had no effect on CEP" (Slater, Dixon-Fowler, 2010). However, the results of the research carried out by Pascal, Mersland and Mori (2017) that included 353 Microfinance institutions (MFIs) from across the globe indicate that "only" 55% of the MFIs have a chief executive officer (CEO) with a business education. The empirical results indicate that MFIs with CEOs who have a business education perform significantly better, financially and socially, than MFIs managed by CEOs with other types of educational backgrounds.…”
Section: Conducting Research and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, post-hoc analysis revealed that the MBA program ranking had no effect on CEP" (Slater, Dixon-Fowler, 2010). However, the results of the research carried out by Pascal, Mersland and Mori (2017) that included 353 Microfinance institutions (MFIs) from across the globe indicate that "only" 55% of the MFIs have a chief executive officer (CEO) with a business education. The empirical results indicate that MFIs with CEOs who have a business education perform significantly better, financially and socially, than MFIs managed by CEOs with other types of educational backgrounds.…”
Section: Conducting Research and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of existing papers researching the effects of entrepreneur innovation on firm performance and economic growth (such as Hamböck et al , 2017; McKenzie, 2017; Pascal et al , 2017; Ehrlich et al , 2017; Feki and Mnif, 2016), there are three kinds of different methods measuring entrepreneur innovation. The first are regional-level measures representing entrepreneur innovation in some given districts, such as the new business density (ND) by the Doing Business Project of the World Bank, and the number of patents filed by residents and non-residents (PAT) (Feki and Mnif, 2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In empirical analyses, many recent papers discuss the effects of entrepreneur innovation on firm performance (Hamböck et al , 2017; McKenzie, 2017; Pascal et al , 2017; Ehrlich et al , 2017; Feki and Mnif, 2016). These papers point out that entrepreneur innovation have significant impacts on firms’ management model, corporation culture, their performance and even the corporation culture at firms (Lazear and Oyer, 2012; Jones, 2010; Jones and Weinberg, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microfinance institutions are hybrid organizations that pursue several social missions (Pascal et al, 2017;Defourny and Nyssens, 2017;Varendh-Mansson et al, 2019), including financial services for disadvantaged populations, the empowerment of women, and rural development (Battilana and Dorado, 2010;Périlleux et al, 2016;Hudon et al, 2020). The financial cooperatives that we studied are microfinance institutions governed by democratic rules.…”
Section: Relevant Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%