2013
DOI: 10.1177/1086296x12469968
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Sources in the Reading of Mathematical Text

Abstract: In a recent article published in this journal, Shanahan, Shanahan, and Misischia investigated the differences in how chemists, historians, and mathematicians read text specific to their disciplines. Unlike the chemists and historians, the pair of mathematicians in this study did not consider sources when reading and evaluating their text. In this response, we contend that most mathematicians regularly do consider sources when reading mathematical arguments and papers. We summarize the results of four empirical… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We began the work prior to publication of some key pieces on disciplinary literacy (e.g., Moje, 2007; Shanahan & Shanahan, 2008). Although we found this scholarship compelling, it did not frame our work with teachers, and we found it challenging to combine the broader sociocultural lens we did use with some of its tenets, particularly its emphasis on insights from the abstract and specialized literacies used by mathematicians in higher education (Shanahan et al, 2011; Weber & Mejia-Ramos, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We began the work prior to publication of some key pieces on disciplinary literacy (e.g., Moje, 2007; Shanahan & Shanahan, 2008). Although we found this scholarship compelling, it did not frame our work with teachers, and we found it challenging to combine the broader sociocultural lens we did use with some of its tenets, particularly its emphasis on insights from the abstract and specialized literacies used by mathematicians in higher education (Shanahan et al, 2011; Weber & Mejia-Ramos, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Shanahan et al (2011) described differences in how expert readers from three disciplines, including theoretical mathematics, engaged in close reading. Drawing on other research into mathematicians’ reading of mathematical arguments, Weber and Mejia-Ramos (2013) challenged some aspects of Shanahan et al’s findings about the nature of reading for mathematicians while supporting others. Both research teams agreed that further inquiry into mathematical reading is needed to develop effective pedagogies.…”
Section: Review Of Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 90%
“…To fulfil this objective, sources may differ according to several aspects: 1. The discipline to which the text belongs, namely history (Rouet et al, 1997), literature (Bloome et al, 2018), science (Goldman & Bisanz, 2002), and mathematics (Weber & Mejia-Ramos, 2013).…”
Section: Universidad De La Sabana Department Of Foreign Languages And...mentioning
confidence: 99%