2003
DOI: 10.1111/1469-8986.00105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of semantic and phonological factors on syntactic decisions: An event‐related brain potential study

Abstract: During language production and comprehension, information about a word's syntactic properties is sometimes needed. While the decision about the grammatical gender of a word requires access to syntactic knowledge, it has also been hypothesized that semantic (i.e., biological gender) or phonological information (i.e., sound regularities) may influence this decision. Event-related potentials (ERPs) were measured while native speakers of German processed written words that were or were not semantically and/or phon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
25
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(50 reference statements)
4
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect of phonology on syntactic processing has also recently been investigated in an ERP study of grammatical gender in German (Schiller, Munte, Horemans, & Jansma, 2003). Schiller et al (2003) reported variations in the behavioral data obtained for native speakers, with faster decisions about grammatical gender when either semantic (biological gender) or phonological cues were available. Variations in the ERP response (as indexed by onset and amplitude of the N2OO), however, confirmed only the effect of semantic gender information on accessing syntactic gender information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of phonology on syntactic processing has also recently been investigated in an ERP study of grammatical gender in German (Schiller, Munte, Horemans, & Jansma, 2003). Schiller et al (2003) reported variations in the behavioral data obtained for native speakers, with faster decisions about grammatical gender when either semantic (biological gender) or phonological cues were available. Variations in the ERP response (as indexed by onset and amplitude of the N2OO), however, confirmed only the effect of semantic gender information on accessing syntactic gender information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although our ERP measures are not immune to strategic influences, they might avoid some effects emerging at later response stages. Schiller, Münte, Horemans, and Jansma (2003) investigated phonological regularities in German gender classes and their influence on gender decisions. Although they found a significant effect for RTs in a simple go/no-go task, the peak latency of the inhibition-related N2 effect showed no reliable difference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schiller, Münte, Horemans, and Jansma (2003) showed that gender decisions in German could be influenced by the biological sex (natural gender) of a noun referent. When there was congruency between biological sex and grammatical gender (e.g.…”
Section: Number and Noun Phrase Agreementmentioning
confidence: 99%