2010 IEEE 2nd Symposium on Web Society 2010
DOI: 10.1109/sws.2010.5607371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of procedure justice on work engagement: The mediating role of organizational commitment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, PJ significantly predicted employees' OC (β = .32, t value = 6.15). This result is consistent with S. Li et al (2010) and Loi et al (2006). Fourth, the effect of TL on OC, controlling for the effect of PJ, was significant (β = .08, t value = 3.45).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Third, PJ significantly predicted employees' OC (β = .32, t value = 6.15). This result is consistent with S. Li et al (2010) and Loi et al (2006). Fourth, the effect of TL on OC, controlling for the effect of PJ, was significant (β = .08, t value = 3.45).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The findings confirmed the hypothesis which means that the higher teachers are committed to their school the higher they will be engaged to their work. The studies conducted on teachers ( Çağrı San and Tok, 2017 ; Pieters and Auanga, 2018 ) and other samples such as banking employees ( Adi and Fithriana, 2020 ), private and public sector employees ( Agyemang and Ofei, 2013 ), undergraduate students ( Babcock-Roberson and Strickland, 2010 ), airline companies ( Li et al, 2010 ), National Revenue Administration employees ( Peplińska et al, 2020 ), also put forward consistent findings with this study, while food processing plant employees ( Gota, 2017 ) has found that WE is negatively associated with affective commitment. Based on these findings, it can be said that this study contributed to the literature by proving that WE is up to OC.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Work engagement is measured by an index of four items that capture three dimensions—vigor, dedication, and absorption—of work engagement (Schaufeli et al, 2002). Although many different versions of work engagement measures exist, these dimensions are widely used in recent engagement literature (e.g., Li, Li, & Shi, 2010; Strom, Sears, & Kelly, 2013). 6 Two items measure vigor dimension of engagement: (a) “I feel I can make a difference by working here” and (b) “I am focused on serving the public with integrity.” One item taps dedication dimension of work engagement: “I am proud to work here.” And the fourth item reflects the final dimension, absorption , of work engagement: “I am fully engaged in my job.” These items are strong on face validity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%