1976
DOI: 10.1007/bf02729832
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of price, store name, and brand name on perception of product quality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, price was clearly the dominant quality cue. A somewhat similar result was obtained by Render and O'Connor (1976) in whose study price was the most important quality cue. Store name was of small and brand name was of negligible importance.…”
Section: Price and Brand Namesupporting
confidence: 84%
“…However, price was clearly the dominant quality cue. A somewhat similar result was obtained by Render and O'Connor (1976) in whose study price was the most important quality cue. Store name was of small and brand name was of negligible importance.…”
Section: Price and Brand Namesupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Three studies have examined these attributes as a set (Andrews & Valenzi, 1971;Dodds, Monroe, & Grewal, 1991;Render & O'Connor, 1976), and all have reported treatment effects on perceived product quality. Rao and Monroe (1989) conducted a meta-analysis of 36 studies in which some or all of these three cues were found.…”
Section: Extrinsic Cue Utilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We wished to avoid well known brands in the experiments since respondents may already have gained experiences towards such brands and may therefore 'know' the performance of the products in advance (Andrews & Valenzi, 1971;Render & O'Connor, 1976;Dodds, 1991). (2) The products should differ in terms of their perceived 'luxuriousness' to take into account the possible effect of the food product chosen on emotion.…”
Section: Designmentioning
confidence: 99%