2000
DOI: 10.1007/s003960050532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of polymer molecular-weight distributions on pulsed field gradient nuclear magnetic resonance self-diffusion experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

8
116
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
8
116
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this way, M n and M w of each mixture are known. In the following, we introduce PGSE NMR and reproduce equations [24] for the application of the lognormal [29,30,14] and gamma [21,31] distribution models. We then explain sample preparation and outline the procedure for obtaining ν, M w /M n , and the molecular mass distribution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this way, M n and M w of each mixture are known. In the following, we introduce PGSE NMR and reproduce equations [24] for the application of the lognormal [29,30,14] and gamma [21,31] distribution models. We then explain sample preparation and outline the procedure for obtaining ν, M w /M n , and the molecular mass distribution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the scaling parameters of Eq. (1) specific to that polymersolvent system must be found by measuring ⟨D⟩ on fractionated samples of the polymer with known M. Therefore, currently all PGSE NMR-based methods which convert from D to M cannot independently measure the absolute molecular mass distribution [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25].In this paper we show that ν in Eq.(1) can be directly estimated from a single PGSE experiment in which the extremity (end-group) polymer signal can be spectrally resolved by a chemical shift from the polymer main-chain signal. The scaling exponent, ν, is a measure of the polymer conformation as well as solvent quality [3,26], with bounds of ν = 1/3 for a perfectly coiled, impenetrable, polymer ball and ν = 1 for a perfectly straight polymer rod [17].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The diffusion time was set to ∆ = 100 ms and 128 scans were accumulated at 17 different gradient strengths. As described by Håkansson et al (2000), Garver andCallaghan (1991), andFleischer (1985), the resulting self-diffusion coefficients of the lignin samples could be obtained after fitting the intensity decays (I(k, D)) to a lognormal distribution function where D m denotes the fitted mass-weighted median selfdiffusion coefficient, σ describes the distribution width, k is defined from the experimental settings as and γ is the nuclear magnetogyric radius for protons. Sodium polystyrene sulfonate standards were used to obtain the scaling parameters (K = 1.62 x 10 -8 m 2 /s and α = -0.58) needed to calculate the mass-weighted molar mass distribution by applying the Mark-Houwink relationship between the self-diffusion coefficient (D) and the molar mass (M), i.e.…”
Section: Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, a multiple detection configuration is usually required to reach reliable molecular weight data by SEC, since the intensity of the response obtained in each detection mode does not only depend on molecular weight but also on parameters that are a function of the macromolecule composition [16,17]. Pulsed gradient spin echo (PGSE) [18 -20] NMR can be used to estimate the weight average molecular weight (M w ) of a synthetic homopolymer from the measurement of its molecular self-diffusion coefficient [21][22][23][24]. For block copolymers, we have recently shown that such estimation not only requires properly recorded calibration curves for each of the polymers constituting the blocks, but also a hydrodynamic model to correctly interpret the diffusion data [25].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%