The Influence of Parental Distress on Child Depressive Symptoms in Juvenile Rheumatic Diseases: The Moderating Effect of Illness Intrusiveness

Wagner, Janelle L.; Chaney, John M.; Hommel, Kevin A.; Page, Melanie C.; Mullins, Larry L.; White, Molly M.; Jarvis, James N.

doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsg036

Cited by 98 publications

(97 citation statements)

References 44 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Consistent with hypotheses and existing literature demonstrating transactional parent-child distress relations (e.g., Chaney et al, 1997;Hocking & Lochman, 2005;Kazak, Kassam-Adams, Schneider, Zelikovsky, Alderfer, & Rourke, 2006;Mullins & Chaney, 2001;Thompson, et al, 1999;Thompson, et al, 1994;Thompson & Gustafson, 1996;Wagner, et al, 2003;White et al, 2005), partial correlations revealed significant cross-sectional parent-child distress associations at both time points. In addition, results revealed a significant longitudinal association between T1 parent distress and T2 child distress, although there was a nonsignificant association between T1 child distress and T2 parent distress.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 85%

“…The BSI has been used extensively as a measure of parent emotional adjustment in studies examining parent contributions to child adaptation and outcome to chronic illness (Mullins et al, 1995;Wagner et al, 2003;White et al, 2005). The BSI has been found to have satisfactory internal consistency, ranging from .71 to .85 (Derogatis & Melisaratos, 1983).…”

Section: Parent-report Measuresmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A longitudinal examination of the parent–child distress relationship in children with juvenile rheumatic disease.

Ryan¹,

Ramsey²,

Fedele³

et al. 2010

Rehabilitation Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To examine the longitudinal relationships between parent and child distress in a sample of children with juvenile rheumatic diseases (JRDs). Design: Cross-lagged panel correlation analysis tested the temporal precedence of parent distress versus child distress over a 1-year period. Participants: Thirty-seven children (ages 9–17 years; 22 girls) diagnosed with JRD and their parents completed self-report measures on 2 occasions (assessment interval M = 12 months). Primary Outcome Measures: Child Depression Inventory and Brief Symptom Inventory. Results: Significant cross-sectional parent–child distress associations were observed at both time points. Moreover, Time 1 parent distress predicted child distress at Time 2 after child-reported functional ability was controlled; Time 1 child distress was unrelated to Time 2 parent distress. Cross-lagged panel correlations demonstrated the temporal precedence of parent distress relative to child distress in the parent–child distress relationship. Conclusions: These preliminary findings underscore the importance of parent distress in parent–child transactional adjustment, and suggest a predominant role for parent distress in children's adjustment to JRDs.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 85%

Section: Parent-report Measuresmentioning

confidence: 99%

A longitudinal examination of the parent–child distress relationship in children with juvenile rheumatic disease.

Ryan¹,

Ramsey²,

Fedele³

et al. 2010

Rehabilitation Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Moreover, some other studies have shown that QoL of children diagnosed with cancer is affected negatively when there are health problems, physical or psychosocial, for any other members of their family (23)(24)(25)(26)(27). In particular, it has been found that there is a positive correlation between maternal depression and other chronic health problems in parents or siblings where children and adolescents with cancer express reduced QoL (23,25,26).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessment of quality of life of children and adolescents with cancer during their treatment

Vlachioti

Matziou

Perdikaris

et al. 2016

Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the quality of life of children and adolescents with any type of cancer in all phases of their treatment. Methods: Fifty-six newly diagnosed patients diagnosed with malignancy and hospitalized in a Pediatric Hematology-Oncology Unit in Athens were included in the study. Minneapolis-Manchester Quality of Life Instrument was used for data collection from July 2010 to December 2012. The assessment of children and adolescents' quality of life who were under treatment was performed in three different stages of treatment. Results: The results of the study showed that the quality of life of children and adolescents with cancer did not change notably during their treatment (F = 0.16, P = 0.86 and F = 0.03, P = 0.97). For the first measurement, at the beginning of the therapy, the score on the scale for quality of life for children and adolescents was 3.44 and 3.88, respectively, in the middle of the treatment 3.36 and 3.89, respectively, and 3.43 and 3.89, respectively, when therapy was completed. Children and adolescents diagnosed with hematologic cancer stated higher quality of life scores (z = −1.61, P = 0.05 and t = 2.64, P = 0.007). Moreover, teenage patients (F = 13.22, P = 0.001) and male patients (t = 2.31, P = 0.02 and t = 2.27, P = 0.02) expressed better quality-of-life scores. Conclusion: According to the results, children and adolescents with any kind of cancer have better quality-of-life scores at the end of their treatment, and when they are supported by their family.

show abstract

“…More specifically, those with a sibling with a chronic condition had particularly poor physical and social QoL. Others have shown that parents with poor physical or psychosocial health have children with poorer QoL in several different conditions (Silver et al, 1998;Waters et al, 2000;Wagner et al, 2003;Williams et al, 2003). A study in paediatric cancer also found an association between maternal depression and child selfreported poor QoL (Vance et al, 2001).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Identification of paediatric cancer patients with poor quality of life

et al. 2008

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The primary objective was to describe predictors of physical, emotional and social quality of life (QoL) in children receiving active treatment for cancer. This Canadian multi-institutional cross-sectional study included children with cancer receiving any type of active treatment. The primary caregiver provided information on child physical, emotional and social QoL according to the PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core scales. Between November 2004 and February 2007, 376 families provided the data. In multiple regression, children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia had better physical health (OR: 0.37, 95% CI 0.23, 0.60; P <0.0001) while intensive chemotherapy treatment (OR: 2.34, 95% CI: 1.42, 3.85; P =0.0008) and having a sibling with a chronic condition (OR: 2.53, 95% CI: 1.54, 4.15; P =0.0002) were associated with poor physical QoL. Better emotional health was associated with good prognosis, less intensive chemotherapy treatment and greater household savings, whereas female children and those with a sibling with a chronic condition had poor social QoL. Physical, emotional and social QoL are influenced by demographic, diagnostic and treatment variables. Sibling and household characteristics are associated with QoL. This information will help to identify children at higher risk of poor QoL during treatment for cancer.

show abstract

The Influence of Parental Distress on Child Depressive Symptoms in Juvenile Rheumatic Diseases: The Moderating Effect of Illness Intrusiveness

Cited by 98 publications

References 44 publications

A longitudinal examination of the parent–child distress relationship in children with juvenile rheumatic disease.

A longitudinal examination of the parent–child distress relationship in children with juvenile rheumatic disease.

Assessment of quality of life of children and adolescents with cancer during their treatment

Identification of paediatric cancer patients with poor quality of life

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About