The influence of MRI scan position on image registration accuracy, target delineation and calculated dose in prostatic radiotherapy

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the necessity of performing MRI in the radiotherapy position when using MRI for prostatic radiotherapy. Methods: 20 prostate patients received a CT, diagnostic MRI and an MRI scan in the radiotherapy position. The quality of registration between CT and MRI was compared between the two MRI set-ups. The prostate and seminal vesicles were contoured using all scans and intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans were generated. Changes in the target volume and IMRT plans were investigated. Two-tailed paired Student's ttests determined the statistical significance.Results: There was a decrease in the mean distance from the centre of the bony anatomy between CT and MRI (from 3.9 to 1.9 mm, p-value,0.0001) when the MRI scan was acquired in the radiotherapy position. Assuming that registering CT with an MRI scan in the radiotherapy position is the gold standard for delineating the prostate and seminal vesicles, using a planning target volume delineated on the CT with a diagnostic MRI scan viewed separately, resulted in a mean conformation number of 0.80 instead of the expected 0.98 (p,0.0001). Conclusion: By registering CT with an MRI scan in the radiotherapy position, there is a statistically significant improvement in the registration and IMRT quality. Advances in knowledge: To achieve an acceptable registration and IMRT quality in prostatic radiotherapy, neither CT with a separate diagnostic MRI nor CT registered to a diagnostic MRI will suffice. Instead, a CT registered with an MRI in the radiotherapy position should be used.

Important Differences Exist in Posterior Condylar Offsets in an Osteological Collection of 1,058 Femurs

“…Therefore, measurements with the MicroScribe digitizer are not limited to the coronal, sagittal, or axial plane generated radiographically. Additionally, the MicroScribe digitizer has positional resolution and accuracy that approaches or exceeds that of many X-ray, CT, and MRI PACS systems [33]. Because of these differences in measuring protocols, exact measurement values differ between studies; although the context of our conclusions is consistent with prior results.…”

The influence of MRI scan position on patients with oropharyngeal cancer undergoing radical radiotherapy

“…While the advantages in positioning patients in a similar way to their CT planning scan when acquiring MR images are also known [6,17,23], this is the first study to compare the CT-MRI registration accuracy and dosimetric effects of a diagnostic versus RT positioned MRI scan in patients with oropharyngeal cancer.…”

“…Patient positioning must also be considered, since differing patient set-ups between modalities can result in uncertainties in the location and magnitude of the GTV and thus the dose received by the patient [17]. …”

Estimation of geometrically undistorted B0inhomogeneity maps

“…Currently, MRI is recommended [Pech et al 2008, Hentschel et al 2011] for target delineation in many forms of precise radiation treatment [Guo et al 1993, Chung et al 2004, Haie-Meder et al 2005, Lim et al 2011, Hanvey et al 2012]. In addition, MRI can provide physiological and metabolic information for evaluating and characterizing tumors and normal tissues, and their responses to radiation therapy.…”