2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2010.00798.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of learning styles, enrolment status and gender on academic performance of optometry undergraduates

Abstract: Our research has shown that the majority of optometry students have balanced learning styles and, from the factors studied, academic performance is only influenced by enrollment status. Although learning style questionnaires offer suggestions on how to improve learning efficacy, our findings indicate that current teaching methods do not need to be altered to suit varying learning style preferences as balanced learning styles can easily adapt to any teaching style (Learning Styles and Pedagogy in Post-16 Learni… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
14
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(34 reference statements)
4
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Accommodating hypermedia systems in accordance with learning styles are not recommended due to the weak correlation between learning styles, perceived satisfaction, and technology acceptance. This supports literature that pointed out learning styles did not influence academic performance as well (Al-Azawei, Al-Bermani, & Lundqvist, 2016;Gomes & Mendes, 2010;Prajapati, Dunne, Bartlett, & Cubbidge, 2011); 2. Educational institutions should consider other factors to enhance student satisfaction and behavioural intention towards LMS rather than exerting time and effort into integrating learning styles; 3.…”
Section: Implications Recommendations and Limitationssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Accommodating hypermedia systems in accordance with learning styles are not recommended due to the weak correlation between learning styles, perceived satisfaction, and technology acceptance. This supports literature that pointed out learning styles did not influence academic performance as well (Al-Azawei, Al-Bermani, & Lundqvist, 2016;Gomes & Mendes, 2010;Prajapati, Dunne, Bartlett, & Cubbidge, 2011); 2. Educational institutions should consider other factors to enhance student satisfaction and behavioural intention towards LMS rather than exerting time and effort into integrating learning styles; 3.…”
Section: Implications Recommendations and Limitationssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…In other words, there was likely a dependency on visual aids as a supplement to verbal content. The female preference for reflective learning and support using visual aids is consistent with other recent related research (Prajapati, Dunne, Bartlett, & Cubbidge, 2011). Female preference for reflective and visual learning could be attributed to the fact that males were found to have a preference for rational evaluation and logic.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…As a next step, we sought to determine whether students’ learning styles predict a change in research self‐efficacy following the training. Keefe defined learning styles as specific “cognitive, affective, and psychological behaviors that serve as relatively stable indicators of how learners perceive, interact with, and respond to the learning environment.” While they have clear limitations, learning styles are potentially important predictors of short‐term outcomes in training programs that offer individually tailored instruction such as mentored research experiences . Commonly used learning style models have been used successfully to help teachers develop effective instruction methods (http://www.oncourseworkshop.com/Learning046.htm).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also explored the association of specific learning styles with trainees' gender and research ranking of their medical school. There is inconsistent evidence in the literature about gender differences in learning styles . There also is a possibility that trainees coming from schools with high research ranking may have greater research self‐efficacy at baseline and/or may benefit more from a summer research training program than their peers from lower ranked medical schools.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%