2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2010.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of heat treatment and role of boron on sliding wear behaviour of ββ-type Ti–35Nb–7.2Zr–5.7Ta alloy in dry condition and in simulated body fluids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The previous results showed that the laser processed TiB/Ti6Al4V MMC composites have refined TiB precipitates, which offer attractive properties including increased stiffness and excellent wear resistance (OcelÕ´k et al, 2005;Samuel et al, 2008;Wang et al, 2008). These laser deposited composites with refined microstructure showed superior properties than the TiB/Ti6Al4V MMC prepared by other conventional techniques (Majumdar et al, 2012(Majumdar et al, , 2011.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The previous results showed that the laser processed TiB/Ti6Al4V MMC composites have refined TiB precipitates, which offer attractive properties including increased stiffness and excellent wear resistance (OcelÕ´k et al, 2005;Samuel et al, 2008;Wang et al, 2008). These laser deposited composites with refined microstructure showed superior properties than the TiB/Ti6Al4V MMC prepared by other conventional techniques (Majumdar et al, 2012(Majumdar et al, , 2011.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In this context, researches on biomaterials and the implant systems industry have focused interest in developing (i) innovative alloys, ideally free of aluminum or vanadium, which have better compatibility, both biological (absence of toxicity) and mechanical (lower elastic modulus) [ 3 , 4 , 5 ]; and (ii) surface modifications to improve the regenerative capacity of the adjacent bone, providing biological stimuli at the implant interface [ 6 , 7 , 8 ], but at the same time inhibiting biofilm formation if the implant is exposed…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%