2019
DOI: 10.1155/2019/6067952
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Geometry of Implants for Direct Skeletal Attachment of Limb Prosthesis on Rehabilitation Program and Stress-Shielding Intensity

Abstract: The purpose of the research was to evaluate the influence of selected parameters of the implants for bone anchored prostheses on possibility of conducting static load bearing exercises and stress-shielding intensity. A press-fit implant, a threaded implant, and the proposed design were compared using the finite element method. For the analyses two features were examined: diameter (19.0 – 21.0 mm) and length (75.0 – 130.0 mm). To define the possibility of conducting rehabilitation exercises the micromotion of i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(62 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The intention was to provide knowledge on how the careful selection of design features can minimize the risk of bone or implant fracture during use. This study contrasts earlier FEbased studies which have been either case studies with subject specific anatomy [25]- [32], studies focused exclusively on bone remodelling around the implant [31], [33], or FE-implementations with too low resolution to accurately capture the stress in the threaded region [25], [27]- [30], [32], [34]- [37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The intention was to provide knowledge on how the careful selection of design features can minimize the risk of bone or implant fracture during use. This study contrasts earlier FEbased studies which have been either case studies with subject specific anatomy [25]- [32], studies focused exclusively on bone remodelling around the implant [31], [33], or FE-implementations with too low resolution to accurately capture the stress in the threaded region [25], [27]- [30], [32], [34]- [37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The intention was to provide knowledge on how the careful selection of design features can minimize the risk of bone or implant fracture during use. This study contrasts earlier FEbased studies which have been either case studies with subject specific anatomy [25]- [32], studies focused exclusively on bone remodelling around the implant [31], [33], or FE-implementations with too low resolution to accurately capture the stress in the threaded region [25], [27]- [30], [32], [34]- [37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The SAMs-coated surfaces exhibited a decrease in stiffness as a consequence of the formation of the bisphosphonate monolayer, which could disperse stress concentration, hence decreasing the stress shielding effect [40]. The formation of stress shielding can cause a loss of bone tissue around the implant and poor osseointegration [41][42][43]. Accordingly, the PUA-SAM/TiO sample is believed to prevent the stress shielding effect and possess better in vivo bone regeneration ability in comparison to the control sample and the other SAMs-coated samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%