The Influence of Emotional Dissonance on Subjective Health and Job Satisfaction: Testing the Stress–Strain–Outcome Model

Cheung, Francis; Tang, Camelia Qian Ying

doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00697.x

Cited by 36 publications

(33 citation statements)

References 64 publications

(117 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Additionally, the current study only examined one possible correlate of job performance and job satisfaction (cyber incivility), but these out come variables may be influenced by additional workplace factors other than cyber incivility. For example, pay (Judge, Piccolo, Podsakoff, Shaw, & Rich, 2010), relationships with supervisors (Har ris, Harris, & Brouer, 2009), job characteristics (Cheung & Tang, 2010), individual differences (Wu & Griffin, 2012), and growth opportunities (Ford & Wooldridge, 2012) may influence job satisfaction. In addition, the level of workfamily conflict that an individuals experience may impact the amount of stress individuals might be under and their reported levels of satisfaction and perfor mance (OdleDusseau, Britt, & GreeneShortridge, 2012;Spector et al, 2007).…”

Section: Limitations and Future Research Directionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Linking Cyber Incivility With Job Performance Through Job Satisfaction: The Buffering Role of Positive Affect

Giumetti¹,

Saunders²,

Brunette³

et al. 2016

PsiChiJournal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Limitations and Future Research Directionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Linking Cyber Incivility With Job Performance Through Job Satisfaction: The Buffering Role of Positive Affect

Giumetti¹,

Saunders²,

Brunette³

et al. 2016

PsiChiJournal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Limitations and Future Research Directionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Does Fitness Priming Influence Self- and Other-Judgements of Personal and Physical Characteristics?

Burris¹,

Brownlow²,

Lins³

2016

PsiChiJournal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As I write these lines, Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research has fully transitioned to the editorial stew ardship of Dr. Debi Brannan. It is a bittersweet time; I treasured deeply the tasks of editing the Psi Chi Journal. For nearly 5 years, I benefitted from reading cuttingedge research in broad topics across psy chology. I was inspired by the knowledge that most of the authors were upandcoming researchers whose sense of efficacy could be nurtured through a positive publication experience. I reveled in the beauty of watching undergraduate and graduate researchers shine, faculty mentors nurture our next generation of researchers, and colleagues support Psi Chi Journal authors in putting forth the best possible work. I retain a sense of awe at watching a community of scholars seamlessly collaborate for the greater good of science and psychology. I step down with a sense of having gained much more than I contributed. This editorial summarizes the road we-the editorial team-traveled during my years as editor of this fine Journal. The Journal edito rial team accomplishments since November of 2011 and until July of 2016 included advances in both structure and function of the Journal. Psi Chi Journal's notable changes in the 2011-16 period include a name change, expansion of author submissions, a shift from paper to online submis sions, and indexing in EBSCO Academic Search Complete and PsycINFO. We also created a Google Scholar profile. These changes were intended to increase the visibility, and thus impact, of Psi Chi Journal in the field. Increasing author submissions would allow us to increase the selectivity of pub lished works. Increased visibility through indexing increases the probability of citation. Google Scholar allowed us to track the impact of specific articles and to calculate an h index for the Journal. At the time of this printing, the h index for the Journal was WINTER 2016 PSI CHI JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH

show abstract

“…Empirical findings generally support these propositions as they have documented associations between emotion regulation requirements and negative job outcomes (see Hülsheger & Schewe, 2011 for a recent meta-analysis). Specifically, associations between emotion regulation requirements and job dissatisfaction (Cheung & Tang, 2010;Côté & Morgan, 2002), emotional exhaustion (Chau, Dahling, Levy, & Diefendorff, 2009;Zapf & Holz, 2006), depersonalization (Brotheridge & Grandey, 2002), absenteeism (Diestel & Schmidt, 2010), organizational turnover (Goodwin, Groth, & Frenkel, 2011), and psychosomatic complaints (for a review see Zapf, 2002) have been demonstrated.…”

Section: Predicted Affect Regarding Expected Organizational Changes Amentioning

confidence: 99%

Emotion regulation requirements and affective forecasts regarding expected organizational changes

Kubicek¹,

Hoelzl²,

Korunka³

2013

Psihološka obzorja / Horizons of Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In organizational change processes, employees develop expectations of future events and make affective forecasts about their affective reactions to these events. When making such affective forecasts, people often project their current affect onto future events without considering the unique characteristics of the events. Although affective forecasts have been assessed in several applied settings, only a few studies have examined work contexts. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess whether employees making work-related affective forecasts also rely on current affect. Moreover, the study investigated whether employees whose work frequently requires regulation of their emotions are less likely to project their current work-related affect into the future. Cross-sectional data gathered from 1610 Austrian eldercare workers supported these assumptions. Employees relied heavily on current affect when making work-related affective forecasts. However, employees who reported that their work demanded high levels of emotion regulation exhibited a weaker relationship between current affect and predicted affect. We suggest that these findings have implications for understanding and managing organizational change processes.

show abstract

The Influence of Emotional Dissonance on Subjective Health and Job Satisfaction: Testing the Stress–Strain–Outcome Model

Cited by 36 publications

References 64 publications

Linking Cyber Incivility With Job Performance Through Job Satisfaction: The Buffering Role of Positive Affect

Linking Cyber Incivility With Job Performance Through Job Satisfaction: The Buffering Role of Positive Affect

Does Fitness Priming Influence Self- and Other-Judgements of Personal and Physical Characteristics?

Emotion regulation requirements and affective forecasts regarding expected organizational changes

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About