2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10811-019-01914-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of different CO2 concentrations on the biochemical and molecular response of two isolates of Dunaliella sp. (ABRIINW-CH2 and ABRIINW-SH33)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
1
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In accordance, a previous study showed significant accumulation of polyphenols in Acutodesmus dimorphus under 200 mM NaCl conditions 149.24 μg g −1 FW compared to 138.49 μg g −1 FW in the control after 3 days of culture ( Chokshi et al., 2017 ). SOD act as the first line of defense against ROS, these enzymes protect cells from oxidative stress by the dismutation of superoxide radical to molecular oxygen and H 2 O 2 ( Singh et al., 2018 ; Moghimifam et al., 2020 ; Zhang et al., 2020 ). In the present study, the activity of SOD decreased significantly under 200 mM NaCl conditions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In accordance, a previous study showed significant accumulation of polyphenols in Acutodesmus dimorphus under 200 mM NaCl conditions 149.24 μg g −1 FW compared to 138.49 μg g −1 FW in the control after 3 days of culture ( Chokshi et al., 2017 ). SOD act as the first line of defense against ROS, these enzymes protect cells from oxidative stress by the dismutation of superoxide radical to molecular oxygen and H 2 O 2 ( Singh et al., 2018 ; Moghimifam et al., 2020 ; Zhang et al., 2020 ). In the present study, the activity of SOD decreased significantly under 200 mM NaCl conditions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the consequences of stress is an increase in EPS production, to protect the cells [54]. In addition, increased ROS can oxidize membranes and proteins, so that EPS production can occur in an attempt to replace the molecules destroyed [53]. No significant differences in either ROS or EPS production were observed in Synechocystis sp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different types of stress are known to increase ROS production, as found for Dunaliella sp. microalgae, for which it was observed that the amounts of H 2 O 2 were higher in the strains grown under 0.03% of CO 2 (near current atmospheric levels) than those grown at 10% [53]. One of the consequences of stress is an increase in EPS production, to protect the cells [54].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Não obstante, os resultados relatados acima sugerem que, mesmo quando submetidas a concentrações relativamente elevadas de gás carbônico (>10%, 1 atm) e a condições de restrição nutricional, as culturas de M1B-S podem atingir altas concentrações celulares e fixar apreciáveis quantidades de CO2. Tal comportamento, ideal para o emprego de microrganismos no tratamento de gases de exaustão industriais (3-25% CO2), não é exibido por muitas espécies de microalgas e de bactérias autotróficas avaliadas para a captura de carbono (WATANABE, OHMURA, SAIKI, 1992;MOGHIMIFAM et al, 2019). Liu et al (2019), por exemplo, reportam cultivos em batelada da microalga C. protothecoides nos quais o aumento da concentração de CO2 de 10% para 20% provoca uma redução média de 50% na biomassa final obtida (de 1,08 g/L para 0,55 g/L).…”
Section: Crescimento Sob Diferentes Concentrações De Co2unclassified
“…Desta forma, a Pb,máx e a TCO2,máx a 20% CO2 foram equivalentes a 63,72 mg/L/d e 111,0 mg/L/d, respectivamente, e foram atingidas após 9 dias de incubação (Figura 25 e Figura 26). Embora os resultados obtidos demonstrem que pressões parciais de CO2 acima de 0,05 atm (P=1 atm) podem retardar o crescimento da cepa M1B-S e reduzir as suas produtividades e taxas de fixação de CO2, os parâmetros do crescimento quimioautotrófico de M1B-S, obtidos a 5%, 10 % e 20% CO2 (1 atm), são, de modo geral, equiparáveis aos encontrados em muitos cultivos de microalgas e bactérias autotróficas (MOGHIMIFAM et al, 2019;BAE et al, 2001;DE MORAIS, COSTA, 2007). A fim de ilustrar esta comparação, os próximos parágrafos irão relacionar o desempenho de M1B-S com o de outros microrganismos utilizados na captura de carbono.…”
Section: % Co2unclassified