2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00624.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of action perception on object recognition: a developmental study

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
39
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
6
39
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It relates to the studies with adults of Wexler et al (1998) as well as Wohlschläger and Wohlschläger (1998). The presentation of "tools", which means things that can be taken manually, like hammer, brush or screw, is heavily related with an action and the relation of perception and action does develop early in life (Piaget 1952;Mounoud et al 2007). Piaget (1952) proposed that young children learn an understanding of the physical world through the interaction with the body.…”
Section: The Influence Of Motor Performance On Mental-rotation Performentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It relates to the studies with adults of Wexler et al (1998) as well as Wohlschläger and Wohlschläger (1998). The presentation of "tools", which means things that can be taken manually, like hammer, brush or screw, is heavily related with an action and the relation of perception and action does develop early in life (Piaget 1952;Mounoud et al 2007). Piaget (1952) proposed that young children learn an understanding of the physical world through the interaction with the body.…”
Section: The Influence Of Motor Performance On Mental-rotation Performentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The related and nonrelated pictures were presented in either the bottom left or the bottom right corner of the screen, their relative position being counterbalanced across trials. Participants were asked to decide "which one of developmental study, Mounoud, Duscherer, Moy, and Perraudin (2007) have shown that identification and categorization of tools by 7-and 9-year-olds are facilitated by the previous presentation of their corresponding action pantomime. In addition, data from neuroimagery show that tool conceptual processing specifically activates those cerebral areas involved in object manipulation-that is, the parietal and premotor cortices (Chao & Martin, 2000;Gerlach, Law, & Paulson, 2002;Kellenbach, Brett, & Patterson, 2003).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This type of cognitive operation requires representational and abstract thinking (Elder & Pederson, 1978;O'Reilly, 1995;Overton & Jackson, 1973;Piaget, 1962;Ungerer, Zelzao, Kearsley, & O'Leary, 1981). This faculty is not only of interest from a neuropsychological perspective but also from ontogenetic and evolutionary perspectives (Corballis, 2002;Elder & Pederson, 1978;Frey, 2008;Mounoud, Duscherer, Moy, & Perraudin, 2007;O'Reilly, 1995;Overton & Jackson, 1973;Piaget, 1962;Ungerer et al, 1981). In child development, the ability to pantomime tool use reflects that the child has acquired the competence to rely only on a mental representation of the tool (in the absence of the real tool) and to abstract the movement concept from the real tactile experience of the tool.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%