2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0041-0101(03)00046-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The in vitro effects of two chirodropid (Chironex fleckeri and Chiropsalmus sp.) venoms: efficacy of box jellyfish antivenom

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, if intravenous injection of antivenom could be administered as soon as possible, and life saving measures such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation could be undertaken unceasingly (as required by the victim), the antivenom would show its beneficial effects earlier. However, this partially implies that the effects of the venom are reversible (including that venom already bound to cells can be neutralized), which may contradict the currently believed pore-forming mode of action [2,12,22]. Finally, in the light of the rapid onset of symptoms and the fact that experimentally only prophylactic doses of antivenom were effective, the window of opportunity for antivenom administration may indeed be too short [16,19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Conversely, if intravenous injection of antivenom could be administered as soon as possible, and life saving measures such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation could be undertaken unceasingly (as required by the victim), the antivenom would show its beneficial effects earlier. However, this partially implies that the effects of the venom are reversible (including that venom already bound to cells can be neutralized), which may contradict the currently believed pore-forming mode of action [2,12,22]. Finally, in the light of the rapid onset of symptoms and the fact that experimentally only prophylactic doses of antivenom were effective, the window of opportunity for antivenom administration may indeed be too short [16,19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has thus been suggested that the current initial treatment for human envenomation (one to three vials, i.e., 20,000-60,000 units) may be insufficient [9-11]. Further complications regarding the use and effectiveness of the antivenom exist with only prophylactic administrations being able to counteract the venom effects, which suggests that the antivenom is also too slow to attenuate the effects of C. fleckeri venom in a clinically relevant setting [10,12]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, our current understandings of the cardiovascular toxicity of jellyfish venom are very limited, and the underlying mechanism of cardiovascular abnormalities following jellyfish envenomation is still unclear [4,6]. The study on the cardiovascular toxicity of jellyfish venom is mainly hindered by the following reasons: (1) jellyfish venoms are fragile, thermolabile and liable to adhesion, which greatly hampers the identification and isolation of individual components [7,8]; and (2) the collection of venom samples is difficult, due to the small amount of the venoms in nematocysts [6]. To solve the problem, we have previously compared nematocyst venom with tentacle extract (TE, devoid of nematocyst) from the jellyfish, Cyanea capillata .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Box jellyfish antivenom has been shown to significantly neutralize the neurotoxic effects in vitro when given before envenomation (p Ͻ 0.05), with no significant neutralization after 1 h (p Ͻ 0.05), suggesting there may be clinical efficacy if applied quickly after an incident with C. fleckeri (48).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, faster and more refined techniques for venom extraction have been developed, and will hopefully lead to the development of additional antivenoms (48,60,61).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%