2003
DOI: 10.1080/0963828031000069717
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The implementation of the 'International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health' (ICF) in daily practice of neurorehabilitation: an interdisciplinary project at the Kantonsspital of Lucerne, Switzerland

Abstract: Implementation improved considerably the quality of interdisciplinary work processes and contributed to a more systematic approach to rehabilitation tasks by the team members.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
12
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…[11,12]) and expert opinion (e.g. [4]) have supported the use of the ICF to aid communication within clinical practice and this project provides empirical evidence to substantiate this belief.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[11,12]) and expert opinion (e.g. [4]) have supported the use of the ICF to aid communication within clinical practice and this project provides empirical evidence to substantiate this belief.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Nonetheless, 173 papers focused on using it in clinical practice, albeit mainly anecdotal reflections, or applying it in theory. The ICF has potential to improve team communication [11,12]; enhance inter-agency communication [13,14]; help clinicians construct a broader view of disability [15–17]; and clarify team roles [18,19]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the interviewees agreed that the common language of the ICF simplifies interdisciplinary communication [25], some felt that more research is needed about ICF-based assessments before ICF can be usefully implemented. Other authors have also advocated developing additional psychometric tests for the ICF categories and validating the ICF qualifiers before putting ICF into more widespread use [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main conclusions from the clinically focused papers were that the ICF has the potential to improve team communication (e.g. Rentsch et al, 2003;Steiner et al, 2002), enhance inter-agency communication (e.g Martinuzzi et al, 2008;Darzins, Fone and Darzins, 2006), help clinicians construct a broader view of disability (e.g. O'Donovan, Doyle and Gallagher, 2009; Raggi, Leonardi, Cabello and Bickenback, 2010) and clarify team roles (Tempest and McIntyre, 2006;Mitchell, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%