Challenges and potential improvements in the admission process of patients with spinal cord injury in a specialized rehabilitation clinic – an interview based qualitative study of an interdisciplinary team

Abstract

BackgroundThe admission process of patients to a hospital is the starting point for inpatient services. In order to optimize the quality of the health services provision, one needs a good understanding of the patient admission workflow in a clinic. The aim of this study was to identify challenges and potential improvements in the admission process of spinal cord injury patients at a specialized rehabilitation clinic from the perspective of an interdisciplinary team of health professionals.MethodsSemi-structured interviews with eight health professionals (medical doctors, physical therapists, occupational therapists, nurses) at the Swiss Paraplegic Centre (acute and rehabilitation clinic) were conducted based on a maximum variety purposive sampling strategy. The interviews were analyzed using a thematic analysis approach.ResultsThe interviewees described the challenges and potential improvements in this admission process, focusing on five themes. First, the characteristics of the patient with his/her health condition and personality and his/her family influence different areas in the admission process. Improvements in the exchange of information between the hospital and the patient could speed up and simplify the admission process. In addition, challenges and potential improvements were found concerning the rehabilitation planning, the organization of the admission process and the interdisciplinary work.ConclusionThis study identified five themes of challenges and potential improvements in the admission process of spinal cord injury patients at a specialized rehabilitation clinic. When planning adaptations of process steps in one of the areas, awareness of effects in other fields is necessary. Improved pre-admission information would be a first important step to optimize the admission process. A common IT-system providing an interdisciplinary overview and possibilities for interdisciplinary exchange would support the management of the admission process. Managers of other hospitals can supplement the results of this study with their own process analyses, to improve their own patient admission processes.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2399-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Facilitators and barriers in the rehabilitation process described by persons with spinal cord injury: a deductive-inductive analysis from Finnish Spinal Cord Injury Study

“…It has been known from previous research that communication and interaction have a central role for the successful education, health care, and rehabilitation since the patient-provider communication (17), communication gaps (5) and professionals' lack of communication (12) were reported as barriers for persons with SCI. In the studies where health care professionals were interviewed, these problems have been noticed; In a study by Röthlisberger et al, the communication among various medical disciplines was found to be a challenge, and delays in the communication of a prescription between doctors and nurses created ine ciencies (31). And in contrast, a study by Johnston et al has shown that good communication between the whole staff is a critical element in their work (32).…”

A Comprehensive Review on Managing Fracture Calcaneum by Surgical and Non-surgical Modalities

“…Providing this information helps patients mentally and emotionally prepare for the ups and downs of recovery. Additionally, it encourages open communication between patients and healthcare providers, fostering a collaborative approach to overcoming setbacks and optimising outcomes [ 64 ].…”

Effective Clinical Pathway Improves Interprofessional Collaboration and Reduces Antibiotics Prophylaxis Use in Orthopedic Surgery in Hospitals in Indonesia

“…A good CP is translated from an evidencebased best practice, evaluates processes and outcomes regularly, and the awareness of its benefits in other fields [55]. IT-system support is also crucial in implementing an elegant and sophisticated CP [56]. The positive impacts of CP towards interprofessional collaboration that have been reported were (i) professional contribution with respect to their unique competence, roles, task distribution, and responsibilities to complement each other [57][58][59]; (ii) reduction in the amount of time for communication, shared information, planning, and decision making [57,58]; (iii) the dependence and recognition between profession in the integrative healthcare systems [60]; and, finally, (iv) to foster organization and collaboration culture model [60].…”