2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.04.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impacts of selective logging on non-timber forest products of livelihood importance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
57
0
7

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
(106 reference statements)
0
57
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…In the Congo Basin, timber exploitation is placing growing pressure on local biodiversity, with potential negative repercussions on food security and livelihoods [104]. Some timber species have edible fruits and oil extracted from seeds; others host caterpillars that make up 75% of the protein eaten by the Baka during the period when caterpillars are available [105].…”
Section: Sustainable Use Of Nwfps and Threats To The Resource Basementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Congo Basin, timber exploitation is placing growing pressure on local biodiversity, with potential negative repercussions on food security and livelihoods [104]. Some timber species have edible fruits and oil extracted from seeds; others host caterpillars that make up 75% of the protein eaten by the Baka during the period when caterpillars are available [105].…”
Section: Sustainable Use Of Nwfps and Threats To The Resource Basementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have revealed negative effects of selective logging on wildlife populations (Rist et al 2011). However, conservationists should not dismiss the environmental value of selectively logged forests.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Legal extraction from these concessions requires plans for reforestation, minimizing the socio-cultural effect on the local people and the biological effect on the environment (MINAG 2009). Although many studies have explored the social, economic, and ecological effects of timber concessions (Uhl et al 1991, Verissimo et al 1992, Watson 1996, Lescuyer et al 2012, most have focused on the effects on lumber species targeted for extraction, and relatively few on game and other wildlife species (Rist et al 2011). However, it has been repeatedly shown that timber operations cause widespread negative effects on wildlife populations, including population declines and local extinctions, as well as other effects such as infant malnutrition, abandonment, and mortality (Thiollay 1992, Marsden 1998, Meijaard et al 2006.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From this result, it showed that the tengkawang agroforestry (model 2) was a promising alternative to conserve tengkawang tree and to sustain the economy of the locals. The utilization of non-timber forest products contributed significantly to the economy of people settling around the forest (Jensen 2009;Rist et al 2012;Dawson et al 2014). Wood product consumption will keep increasing.…”
Section: Financial Feasibility Of Tengkawang Cultivation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%