2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00181-012-0673-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of working conditions on sickness absence: a theoretical model and an empirical application to work schedules

Abstract: Les documents de travail ne reflètent pas la position de l'INSEE et n'engagent que leurs auteurs. Working papers do not reflect the position of INSEE but only the views of the authors.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
15
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The baseline estimates in Column (1) show that the fraction of women ever having experienced a long-term illness spell is 3.2 percentage points larger among the treated as compared with controls three years after childbirth. The difference in the fraction length of illness is also estimated to be significantly positive in the medium run, amounting to 1.1 percentage points three years after childbirth.…”
Section: Regression Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The baseline estimates in Column (1) show that the fraction of women ever having experienced a long-term illness spell is 3.2 percentage points larger among the treated as compared with controls three years after childbirth. The difference in the fraction length of illness is also estimated to be significantly positive in the medium run, amounting to 1.1 percentage points three years after childbirth.…”
Section: Regression Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The results for the labor market and health outcome variables corresponding to the placebo-corrected estimates in the last columns of Table 3 and 4 are shown in Column (1) and (2) of Table A3 in the Appendix. As to the labor market effects, the results in Column (1) indicate that especially the magnitude of the short-run effects seems quite robust and varies only slightly over the particular time window one adopts. Even though the estimates in the medium and long-run differ somewhat from those in Table 3, the pattern of insignificant medium and long-run results is very similar to that in Table 3.…”
Section: Robustness Checksmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Better working conditions, in turn, can reduce the incidence of illnesses, improve the motivation of employees, and reduce absenteeism (cf. Afsa and Givord ). However, better working conditions may also imply that employees are less likely to attend work when ill (i.e., reduce sickness presenteeism) and, potentially, increase absence.…”
Section: Related Contributions and Institutional Set‐upmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Labriola et al (2006) find that 40% of Danish sickness absence can be attributed to workplace conditions. The work environment may affect sickness absence through a number of different channels (Benavides et al, 2001;Afsa and Givord, 2013;Vahtera and Kivimäki, 2001;Lund et al, 2005). A poor working environment can directly cause illness or stress, enhance employees' liability to catch ordinary diseases such as for instance a cold, or have a demotivating effect.…”
Section: Previous Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%