Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2018
DOI: 10.1111/faam.12182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of supreme audit institutions and ombudsmen in Belgium and The Netherlands

Abstract: This article investigates the impact of the audit and ombud process on the implementation of recommendations made by supreme audit institutions and ombudsmen in Belgium and the Netherlands. Based on previous findings, the focus lies on influential internal and external factors in determining the effectiveness of the audit and ombud investigations. The article concludes that the impact of the process and factors often mentioned in the literature are less significant than found in other research. Political facto… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(87 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The last 10 years have seen a growing number of studies evaluating also the impact of the auditors as evaluators. Some studies indicate positive but modest impact of performance audit on public administration (Morin, 2001;Raudla, Taro, Agu, & Douglas, 2016), the public debate (Reichborn-Kjennerud, 2014) and the implementation of the auditors' recommendations in some countries (Acker & Bouckaert, 2019). Other studies question its functioning, especially in the Napoleonic, court system (Blume & Voigt, 2011;Morin, 2010;Torres, Yetano, & Pina, 2019 (Lapsley & Pong, 2000;Pierre & Licht, 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The last 10 years have seen a growing number of studies evaluating also the impact of the auditors as evaluators. Some studies indicate positive but modest impact of performance audit on public administration (Morin, 2001;Raudla, Taro, Agu, & Douglas, 2016), the public debate (Reichborn-Kjennerud, 2014) and the implementation of the auditors' recommendations in some countries (Acker & Bouckaert, 2019). Other studies question its functioning, especially in the Napoleonic, court system (Blume & Voigt, 2011;Morin, 2010;Torres, Yetano, & Pina, 2019 (Lapsley & Pong, 2000;Pierre & Licht, 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, fewer studies have focused on evaluating the accountability powers of these institutions (Wilkins 2017;Van Acker and Bouckaert 2019). Therefore, this paper systematically assesses two of the main independent oversight institutions in the EU context, the European Court of Auditors (ECA) and the European Ombudsman (EO).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The media plays an instrumental role in accountability (Dwiputrianti, 2011;Van Acker & Bouckaert, 2018). The performance audit discourse posits that the government is accountable to the public through the oversight bodies in most jurisdictions (Funnel, 1998;Radcliffe, 1998).…”
Section: Content and Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%