2019
DOI: 10.1080/1331677x.2019.1629979
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of state intervention on the Hungarian venture capital market

Abstract: As part of its National Development Programmes in the period 2007-2013 Hungary implemented venture capital instruments to improve the competitiveness of small and medium sized companies. The concrete instruments included both fully and partly state-owned VC funds significantly increasing equity finance available for the target group. In our article, we investigate the impact of the state intervention on the quality of the VC portfolios built through the programmes. We point out that the key indicators of the p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It would also represent linkage with the previous theme in that a strong focus on state-driven funding of entrepreneurship would, by implication, embody inconsistency with the development of market-driven entrepreneurial culture. Kállay and Jáki (2019) corroborate this view by indicating that although the Hungarian state allocated significant resources to funding VC investments from 2010, the value of average yearly investment barely grew. However, the same study indicates the share of public resources placed on the funding market increased from 4% to 86% in Hungary between 2010 and 2018.…”
Section: B State-based Domination Of Investment Provisionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…It would also represent linkage with the previous theme in that a strong focus on state-driven funding of entrepreneurship would, by implication, embody inconsistency with the development of market-driven entrepreneurial culture. Kállay and Jáki (2019) corroborate this view by indicating that although the Hungarian state allocated significant resources to funding VC investments from 2010, the value of average yearly investment barely grew. However, the same study indicates the share of public resources placed on the funding market increased from 4% to 86% in Hungary between 2010 and 2018.…”
Section: B State-based Domination Of Investment Provisionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…In terms of investment volume the effort was successful as during the course of the program, venture capital investment increased dramatically in Hungary compared with previous years (see Figure 2). Other effects of the program are subject to debate in the literature (for example, Becsky-Nagy & Fazekas, 2015;Karsai, 2018;Lovas & Illés, 2018;Berlinger, 2019;Kállay & Jáki, 2019). One aim of the JEREMIE program was that of regional development with participating fund managers intending to invest in peripheral regions of Hungary.…”
Section: Studies and Articlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their results show that university spill-overs affects development of knowledge intensive ventures, but only in case of services. Kállay and Jáki (2019) examined the impact of state intervention on the Hungarian venture capital market. Based on their results public funding in the Hungarian market did not function as an additional source of finance rather it causes a crowding out effect, gives rise to softer project selection standards and the portfolio financed by public funding is likely to end up below the value of the investment of venture capital funds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%