2009
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1490735
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Large Shareholdings and Board Structure on Efficiency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
1
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
2
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When the companies analyzed are considered separately, the number of directors (Regression 1) negatively influences efficiency, i.e., a 1% change in the number of directors adversely affects efficiency by 0.14% at a 10% significance level using the BCC method, and in economic terms, a one-standard-deviation difference of 0.09 has an influence of 0.01%. This result is consistent with the studies of Jensen (1993) and Nanka-Bruce (2009), which state that having a small board of directors can help to increase company performance, thus not rejecting Hypothesis 11. Combined analyses corroborate the assumptions of the model, although this variable is not significant in Regression 8.…”
Section: Analysis Of Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…When the companies analyzed are considered separately, the number of directors (Regression 1) negatively influences efficiency, i.e., a 1% change in the number of directors adversely affects efficiency by 0.14% at a 10% significance level using the BCC method, and in economic terms, a one-standard-deviation difference of 0.09 has an influence of 0.01%. This result is consistent with the studies of Jensen (1993) and Nanka-Bruce (2009), which state that having a small board of directors can help to increase company performance, thus not rejecting Hypothesis 11. Combined analyses corroborate the assumptions of the model, although this variable is not significant in Regression 8.…”
Section: Analysis Of Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In the companies analyzed, the number of directors negatively influences efficiency, thereby not rejecting Hypothesis 11. This result is consistent with Jensen (1993) and Nanka-Bruce (2009), who state that having a small board of directors can help increase company performance. In terms of length of service, when taken separately, this variable negatively affects efficiency, but in the combined analysis, the influence is positive, partially rejecting Hypothesis 12.…”
Section: Conclusion and Contributions Of The Studysupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Rogers ( 2006) apresenta uma síntese dos mecanismos citados em vários estudos, conforme o Quadro 1, considerando os mecanismos internos como endógenos, ou seja, instituídos internamente na empresa e os mecanismos externos como exógenos; criados e impostos pelo mercado. (JENSEN, 1993;YERMACK, 1996;WEISHBACH, 2003;NANKA-BRUCE, 2009). Outros estudos (BOZEC; DIA, 2007;ANDRADE et al 2009; ALMEIDA, R.…”
Section: Mecanismos De Governança Corporativaunclassified