Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1979
DOI: 10.2307/2061224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of heterogeneity in individual frailty on the dynamics of mortality

Abstract: Life table methods are developed for populations whose members differ in their endowment for longevity. Unlike standard methods, which ignore such heterogeneity, these methods use different calculations to construct cohort, period, and individual life tables. The results imply that standard methods overestimate current life expectancy and potential gains in life expectancy from health and safety interventions, while underestimating rates of individual aging, past progress in reducing mortality, and mortality d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
1,596
2
34

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,156 publications
(1,683 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
16
1,596
2
34
Order By: Relevance
“…Esse tipo de heterogeneidade pode ser resultado de erros de medida ou da omissão de variáveis explicativas relevantes (Lancaster, 1979;Vaupel, Manton, & Stallard, 1979). De acordo com Heckman e Singer (1984), sempre que a heterogeneidade em dados de duração é testada em estudos microeconômicos o resultado é positivo.…”
Section: Método E Resultadosunclassified
“…Esse tipo de heterogeneidade pode ser resultado de erros de medida ou da omissão de variáveis explicativas relevantes (Lancaster, 1979;Vaupel, Manton, & Stallard, 1979). De acordo com Heckman e Singer (1984), sempre que a heterogeneidade em dados de duração é testada em estudos microeconômicos o resultado é positivo.…”
Section: Método E Resultadosunclassified
“…However, in reality, individuals are heterogeneous in their unobserved factors or frailty, including genetic make-ups, which serves as the basis for existing theories that explain mortality deceleration at advanced ages, among which is the demographic heterogeneity theory by Vaupel et al 13 It follows that, when an individual's unobserved frailty designated as z is gamma-distributed with mean 1 and variance s 2 , instead of (2), the relationship between s 1 (x) and s 0 (x) becomes…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,11,12 Although of great interest, estimating genetic effects on late life survival is confronted with the distinct mortality pattern and sparse genetic data available. In the literature, different theories or models have been proposed to explain the late life-mortality pattern, 8 among them the heterogeneity model, 13 which assumes individual heterogeneity in unobserved frailty that follows a gamma distribution. Jacobsen et al 11 applied a Cox regression model with gamma-distributed frailty to the Danish 1905 birth cohort data to estimate the age-dependent effect on extreme age survival for the ApoE gene, the only gene whose role on longevity has been consistently demonstrated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For any individual, defining the hazard of death at age x (the risk of dying after surviving to age x) as mðxÞ ¼ r i zm 0 ðxÞ; where r i is the relative risk for genotype i ði ¼ 0; 1 or 2Þ; z is an unobserved individual frailty that also affects survival, and m 0 ðxÞ is the baseline hazard function for an individual with both frailty and genotype relative risk set to 1. The corresponding individual survival function is sðxÞ ¼ e Àr i z R x 0 m 0 ðsÞds : To describe the relationship of the three genotypespecific survival functions, Yashin et al [1999] introduced a model that assumes that the unobserved frailty follows a gamma-distribution with mean 1 and variance s 2 [Vaupel et al, 1979;Vaupel and Yashin, 1985], so that mean survival for the subpopulation carrying genotype i is…”
Section: Population and Genotype-specific Survivalsmentioning
confidence: 99%