1994
DOI: 10.1016/0378-4266(94)00062-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of calls of preferred stock on common shareholders' wealth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, Cowan, Nayar, and Singh (1992) propose a positive relationship because holders should have already converted on their own; therefore, the reason for the call is less likely to be negative information received by management. Similar to Kadapakkam and Tang (1996) and Hingorani et al (1994), we find no relationship between abnormal returns and EXTENT. Therefore, in-the-moneyness does not appear to be an important determinant of price responses to convertible preferred stock call announcements.…”
Section: Cross-sectional Analysismentioning
confidence: 47%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast, Cowan, Nayar, and Singh (1992) propose a positive relationship because holders should have already converted on their own; therefore, the reason for the call is less likely to be negative information received by management. Similar to Kadapakkam and Tang (1996) and Hingorani et al (1994), we find no relationship between abnormal returns and EXTENT. Therefore, in-the-moneyness does not appear to be an important determinant of price responses to convertible preferred stock call announcements.…”
Section: Cross-sectional Analysismentioning
confidence: 47%
“…Kadapakkam and Tang (1996) and Hingorani et al (1994) do not find the underwriting effect to be significant. includes DIVRAT.…”
Section: Cross-sectional Analysismentioning
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations