2007
DOI: 10.1080/14622200701239639
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact and acceptability of Canadian-style cigarette warning labels among U.S. smokers and nonsmokers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
106
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
9
106
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is very likely that feeling states contribute to (but are not necessary for) preference formation, such that positive feeling states associated with stimuli contribute to the creation of positive gist and negative feeling states contribute to the creation of negative gist (e.g., Schwarz & Clore, 2003, see below). For example, graphic cigarette warning labels used in Canada were most effective in reducing smoking among individuals who reported greater fear and disgust in response to the warnings (Hammond, Fong, McDonald, Brown, & Cameron, 2005; see also Peters et al, 2007). As summarized in the next section, there is evidence that feeling states, both integral and incidental to a stimulus, determine judgment and decision making.…”
Section: Valencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is very likely that feeling states contribute to (but are not necessary for) preference formation, such that positive feeling states associated with stimuli contribute to the creation of positive gist and negative feeling states contribute to the creation of negative gist (e.g., Schwarz & Clore, 2003, see below). For example, graphic cigarette warning labels used in Canada were most effective in reducing smoking among individuals who reported greater fear and disgust in response to the warnings (Hammond, Fong, McDonald, Brown, & Cameron, 2005; see also Peters et al, 2007). As summarized in the next section, there is evidence that feeling states, both integral and incidental to a stimulus, determine judgment and decision making.…”
Section: Valencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Kees et al (2006) find that the addition of a graphic visual to a textbased cigarette warning decreases the perceived attractiveness of the cigarette package. In addition, in a study of current text-based U.S. warnings versus current Canadian warnings (with combined text and graphic visuals), Peters et al (2007) show that the Canadian labels produce a greater negative response for U.S. adult smokers without any signs of defensive or reactive responses.…”
Section: Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the research on cigarette warning labels shows that labels are effective in deterring cigarette smoking among college students (23)(24)(25). This research has also shown that the type of cigarette warning labels used (graphic images of disease, images of suffering with testimonials, or emotional tone) affects students differently depending on their smoking status (25).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%