Consumers of packaged goods products in the UnitedKeywords: nu t rition labe li ng, fron t*of-pac kage symbo ls, nu t rition consc iousness, U. S. Food and Drug Ad mi nistrati on C onsumers of packaged food products in the United States now face a dizzy ing array of fro nt -of-package (FOP) nutrition sy mbols and icons, including Kraft's "Sensible Solution," PepsiCo's "Smart Spot," Unilever's "Eat Smart" logo, the Ameri can Heart Assoc iati on's "Heart Chec k," General Mills' "Goodness Comer," the "Guiding Stars" from Hannaford Bros ., Ke llogg's use of the Guide· line Dail y Amo unt s, and , until recentl y, the Keystone Gro up and Nutrition Roundtable's "Smart Choices" icon To combat confusion created by the many sy mbols in the U.S. market, the Smart Choices (SC) icon was deve loped by the Keystone Gro up (a large industry, government , and academic coali tion), and it appea red on pac kages from icon (i.e., Smart Choices [SCI) , a more complex icon (i.e., Traffic Light-Guidelines Daily Amounts [TL-GDAsD, and a no-FOP icon control for the ir effects on nutrition eva luations, nutrient use accuracy, product altitudes, and purchase intentions. In addition, using prior nutrition labe ling research (Burton, Biswas, and Netemeyer 1994; Howlett , Burton, and Kozup 2008;Keller et al. 1997;Kemp et al. 2007), we examine consumers' "nutrition consciousness" as a potential moderator of effects of FOP nutrition icons re lative to Nutrition Facts Pane l infonnation. These study objectives focus on the recent FDA call for research (Federal Register 20 10 , p. 22605) in determining exactly how consumers will evaluate FOP summary icons versus nutrient-specific symbol s.